Penney v. State (1981)

Such reports, files, records, and information shall not be subject to process of subpoena; provided, however, that the commissioner of community supervision may by written order declassify any such records.”); Penney v. State, 157 Ga. App. 737, 739 (3) ( 278 SE2d 460 ) (1981) (construing prior version of OCGA § 42-8-40 to hold that because the relevant “records have been declared confidential and not subject to process of subpoena by statute, the trial court did not err in r…

Such reports, files, records, and information shall not be subject to process of subpoena; provided, however, that the commissioner of community supervision may by written order declassify any such records.”); Penney v. State, 157 Ga. App. 737, 738 (3) ( 278 SE2d 460 ) (1981) (construing prior version of OCGA § 42-8-40 to hold that because the relevant “records have been declared confidential and not subject to process of subpoena by statute, the trial court did not err in r…

Alexander has made no showing that the trial judge’s signature on the arrest warrant “create [d], ipso facto, a situation in which the trial judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Penney v. State, 157 Ga. App. 737, 738 (1) ( 278 SE2d 460 ) (1981). 4.

As Williams has not asserted this ruling as error, we do not reach this issue on appeal. 6 See Serpentfoot v. State, 241 Ga. App. 35, 36-37 (2) ( 524 SE2d 516 ) (1999) (quoting Huff v. McLarty, 241 Ga. 442 ( 246 SE2d 302 ) (1978)). 7 See OCGA § 42-8-38 (a) (“Whenever, within the period of probation, a probation supervisor believes that a probationer under his supervision has violated his probation in a material respect, he may arrest the probationer.”). 8 See Smith v. Nichol…

See Penny v. State, 157 Ga. App. 737, 737-738 (1) ( 278 SE2d 460 ) (1981).