Claim of City of Mankato v. Mahoney (1996)

green · 9 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Mahmood Khan, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council (2014)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

A city council’s quasi-judicial decision “may be modified or reversed when it is ‘[u]nsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted’ or ‘[a]rbitrary or capricious.’” City of Mankato v. Mahoney, 3 542 N.W.2d 689, 691-92 (Minn. App. 1996) (quoting Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (e), (f) (1994)).

quoting Minn. Stat. § 14.69 (e), (f) (1994)

green In re the Rental Dwelling License held by Khan (2011)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

“Routine municipal decisions should be set aside only in those rare instances where the decision lacks any rational basis, and a reviewing court must exercise restraint and defer to the city’s decision.” City of Mankato v. Mahoney, 542 N.W.2d 689, 692 (Minn.App.1996).

green CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis (2001)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

Id. at 692 (reversing revocation of landlord's license where landlord acted res *565 ponsibly to prevent further violations of city noise codes).

reversing revocation of landlord's license where landlord acted res *565 ponsibly to prevent further violations of city noise codes

green In Re Dakota Telecommunications Group (1999)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

See Minn.Stat. § 14.69 (1998) (permitting reversal if agency decision was arbitrary or capricious); City of Mankato v. Mahoney, 542 N.W.2d 689, 691-92 (Minn.App. 1996) (noting decision may be reversed if unsupported by substantial evidence, or arbitrary and capricious); see also Resene Mining Co. v. Herbst, 256 N.W.2d 808, 825 (Minn.1977) (defining “substantial evidence”).

noting decision may be reversed if unsupported by substantial evidence, or arbitrary and capricious

green Staeheli v. City of St. Paul (2007)

Cited · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see

See City of Mankato v. Mahoney, 542 N.W.2d 689, 693 (Minn.App.1996).

green Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis (2001)

Cited · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see

See City of Mankato v. Mahoney, 542 N.W.2d 689, 693 (Minn.App.1996).

green Resolution Revoking License 000337 West Side Pawn—880 South Robert Street (1998)

Cited · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see

See City of Mankato v. Mahoney, 542 N.W.2d 689, 692 (Minn.App.1996) (“Routine municipal decisions should be set aside only in those rare instances where the decision lacks any rational basis.”).