North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson (1989)

green · 25 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199120082026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Johnson v. Harris (2007)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

App. 3d at 515 , 854 N.E.2d at 713-14 , referring to North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson, 442 N.W.2d 848, 855 (Minn. App. 1989).

green Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. (2004)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. v. Carlson, 442 N.W.2d 848, 855 (Minn.App.1989) (concluding that negligently throwing flaming gasoline can to avoid injury is not act of independent significance, even when bystanders injured), review denied (Minn. Sept. 21, 1989).

green Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Marti (2016)

Rule Authority · D. Minnesota

In North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson, 442 N.W.2d 848, 853 (Minn.Ct.App.1989), the Minnesota Court of Appeals considered whether three individuals would be covered under the homeowners insurance policy of a relative who lived on adjoining property.

green Foremost Signature Insurance Co. v. Montgomery (2008)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co. v. Carlson, 442 N.W.2d 848, 855 (Minn.Ct.App.1989) (same).

green Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Marvin (2006)

Rule Authority · Minn. Ct. App.

Co. v. Carlson, 442 N.W.2d 848, 855 (Minn.App.1989) (stating that there is no intervening act of independent significance to break the causal link between the car engine fire, the insured’s reflexive action of throwing the flaming can, and the can’s striking the victim), review denied (Minn. Sept. 21, 1989).

green Krempl v. Unigard Security Insurance (1993)

Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.

Co. v. Carlson, 442 N.W.2d 848, 855 (Minn. Ct. App.), review denied (Minn. Sept. 21, 1989); Volkswagen Ins.

green Minnesota Property Insurance v. Slater (2004)

Cited · Minn. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Carlson, 442 N.W.2d at 855 (applying the Karpe analysis and finding that the third factor automatically applies).

applying the Karpe analysis and finding that the third factor automatically applies