Babinski v. American Family Insurance Group (2009)
green
· 40 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 19 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Group, 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir.2009) ("Whether a federal court should certify a question to a state court is a matter of discretion.” (quotation omitted)).
green
Charles E. Bethel, II v. Darwin Select Insurance Co. (2013)
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir.2009) (applying Minnesota law).
green
W3i Mobile, LLC v. Westchester Fire Insurance (2011)
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 351 (8th Cir.2009).
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 351-52 (8th Cir. 2009).
Group, 569 F.3d 349, 351 (8th Cir. 2009).
green
Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. Eric J. Orloske (2016)
In Babinski , we noted that “Minnesota’s doctrine of reasonable expectations is extremely narrow and applies only on the few egregious occasions when an exclusion is disguised in a policy’s definitions section.” Id. at 353 (quotation and citation omitted).
quotation and citation omitted
green
Bonn v. City of Omaha (2010)
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 351 (8th Cir.2009).
Group, 569 F.3d 349, 352 (8th Cir. 2009).
Group, 569 F.3d 349, 352 (8th Cir.2009).
green
Prisk v. Travelers Indemnity Company of America (2022)
In support of its argument, Travelers relies on Babinski v. American Farm Insurance Group, in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit determined to be enforceable a “drop-down” provision capping liability coverage for a certain category of accidents at a level below the overall coverage limit. 569 F.3d 349, 352 (8th Cir. 2009).
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir. 2009).
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. (2017)
Family Ins., 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir. 2009) (holding that the doctrine of reasonable expectations “applies only on the few ‘egregious’ occasions when an exclusion is disguised in a policy’s definitions section” (citations omitted)).
holding that the doctrine of reasonable expectations “applies only on the few ‘egregious’ occasions when an exclusion is disguised in a policy’s definitions section” (citations omitted)
Grp., 569 F.3d 349, 351 (8th Cir.2009) (citing Carlson v. Allstate Ins.
green
Roth v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society (2015)
Group, 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir.2009) (“ Whether a federal court should certify a question to a state court is a matter of discretion.’ ” (quoting Johnson v. John Deere Co., 935 F.2d 151, 153 (8th Cir.1991)).
green
Hagen v. Siouxland Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C. (2013)
Group, 569 F.3d 349, 353 (8th Cir.2009) (“ ‘Whether a federal court should certify a question to a state court is a matter of discretion.’ ”) (quoting Johnson v. John Deere Co., 935 F.2d 151, 153 (8th Cir.1991)); see also Anderson v. Hess Corp., 649 F.3d 891, 891 (8th Cir. 2011); Jung v. General Cas.
green
United States v. Maurice Owen (2022)
See Minn. Stat. § 152.023 (defining “controlled substance crime in the third degree”). -3- 569 F.3d 349, 354 (8th Cir. 2009) (“[D]ecisions of the Minnesota Court of Appeals ‘are persuasive authority, and we must follow them when they are the best evidence of what state law is.’” (brackets omitted)).
“[D]ecisions of the Minnesota Court of Appeals ‘are persuasive authority, and we must follow them when they are the best evidence of what state law is.’” (brackets omitted)
green
Babinski Properties v. Union Insurance (2011)
See Babinski I, 569 F.3d at 353 .