Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. (1955)

green · 217 citation events across 39 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 14

Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

195519902026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Wilson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

The judgment is reversed. 349 U.S. at 901, 75 S.Ct. at 576.

green Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co. (1983)

Cited · SCOTUS · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See 355 U. S., at 392 , citing Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672 (1954), and Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U. S. 44 (1955); see n. 16, supra. The instant case does not raise a Commerce Clause issue because the parties agree that the gas is not in interstate commerce and because Congress, by §602, authorized the State to regulate its price.

green Mejia Rodriguez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. (2011)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See Pino v. London, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955).

green Abreu v. Holder (2010)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Marino v. INS, 537 F.2d 686, 691 (2d Cir.1976) (“[A]n alien is not deemed to have been ‘convicted’ of a crime under the [INA]” until “direct appellate review of the conviction (as contrasted with collateral attack) has been exhausted or waived.”) (relying on Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955)).

green Puello v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services (2007)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

See Moosa v. INS, 171 F.3d 994 , 1000 n. 4 (5th Cir.1999) (citing Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955)); see also Marino v. INS, 537 F.2d 686, 691 (2d Cir.1976) (holding that, at that time, “an alien is not deemed to have been ‘convicted’ of a crime under the [INA] until ... direct appellate review of the conviction ... has been exhausted or waived.”) (citations omitted).

green Daniel Magana-Pizano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1999)

Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955); In re Ozkok, 191 & N Dec. 546, 551-52, 1988 WL 235459 (BIA 1988); In re L-R-, 8 I & N Dec. 269, 270 , 1959 WL 11561 (BIA 1959).

green Geilher Molina v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (1992)

Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see

See Pino v. London, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (holding that the federal immigration law word “conviction” requires “finality” despite state law precedent suggesting the contrary); see also Yazdchi v. INS, 878 F.2d 166, 167 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 978 , 110 S.Ct. 505 , 107 L.Ed.2d 507 (1989) (definition of the word “conviction” primarily a matter of federal law); Chong v. INS, 890 F.2d 284, 285 (11th Cir.1989) (same); Kolios v. INS, 532 F.2…

holding that the federal immigration law word “conviction” requires “finality” despite state law precedent suggesting the contrary

green Paolo Zinnanti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1981)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (per curiam).

per curiam

green Giuseppe Marino v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice (1976)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

See Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (per curiam), rev’g, Pino v. Nicolls, 215 F.2d 237 (1st Cir. 1954).

green Samuel Murillo Gutierrez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles (1963)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220 , 47 S.Ct. 582 , 71 L.Ed. 1009 .” (Emphasis added.) Under the second specification of ■error, petitioner places his reliance on Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) which per ■curiam reverses Pino v. Nicolls, 215 F.2d 237 (1st Cir., 1954).

green Juan Quilodran-Brau v. J. W. Holland, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service (1956)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Pino v. Nicolls, 1 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 237, 245 , reversed on other grounds, Pino v. Landon, 1955, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1273 .

green Leggett v. Duke Energy Corp. (2010)

Cited (see also) · Tenn. · signal: see, e.g. · 3 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Am. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44, 44-45 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 866 (1955) (holding that Oklahoma law was pre-empted); Phillips, 347 U.S. at 684 , 74 S.Ct. 794 (considering whether “states may regulate” certain natural gas sales under the NGA); Ill.

holding that Oklahoma law was pre-empted

green Almeida v. Lucey (1974)

Cited (see also) · D. Mass. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

See also Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955); Will v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 447 F.2d 529 (7 Cir. 1971); State v. DeBery, 150 Me. 28 , 103 A.2d 523 (1954).

green Montenegro v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003)

Cited · C.D. Ill. · signal: see

See Pino v. Nicolls, 215 F.2d 237, 244 (1st Cir.1954), rev’d on other grounds 349 U.S. 901 , 75 S.Ct. 576 , 99 L.Ed. 1239 (1955) (stating that “judicial action in the normal routine appellate review provided by law, [is] part of the ordinary processes of re-examination, the outcome of which perhaps ought to be awaited before it can be said, with sufficient certainty and definiteness, that the state has ‘convicted’ the alien of crime”); Will v. I.N.S., 447 F.2d 529, 533 (7th …