How cited: Pamlico Marine Co. v. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources & Community Developm… · Go Syfert

Pamlico Marine Co. v. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, Coastal Resources Commission Division (1986)

green · 24 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 9
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198920072026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Riggings Homeowners, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Commission (2013)
Quote Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986) (“[A]n administrative agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is to be given due deference by the courts unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”).
“[A]n administrative agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is to be given due deference by the courts unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”
green Sound Rivers (2020)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986) (“Ordinarily, an administrative agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is to be given due deference by the courts unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”(citation omitted)).
“Ordinarily, an administrative agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is to be given due deference by the courts unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”(citation omitted)
green Sound Rivers (2020)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986) (“Ordinarily, an administrative agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is to be given due deference by the courts unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”(citation omitted)).
“Ordinarily, an administrative agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is to be given due deference by the courts unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.”(citation omitted)
green Justice for Animals, Inc. v. Robeson County (2004)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 207 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112-13 (1986).
green Teasley v. Beck (2002)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986) (citation omitted). *291 Theodis Beck, the Secretary at the time of this appeal, stated in an affidavit that he did not possess the authority to consider inmates for parole, and that 5 N.C.
citation omitted
green Huntington Properties, LLC v. Currituck County (2002)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 203-04 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 111 (1986).
green CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CO., LLC v. Offerman (2000)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986).
green Simonel v. North Carolina School of the Arts (1995)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986).
green P.A.W. v. Town of Boone Board of Adjustment (1989)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986); 3 American Law of Zoning Sec. 18.06.