Shaivitz v. Shaivitz (2002)

green · 54 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 6

Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200220142026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Hanlin v. State (2004)

Cited (see also) · Ark. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion

See, e.g., Howard v. State, 348 Ark. 471 , 79 S.W.3d 273 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1051 (2002); Marshall v. State, 342 Ark. 172 , 27 S.W.3d 392 (2000).

green Phinny Paul Norton v. State (2015)

Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see

App. 2005); see State v. Ballman, 157 S.W.3d 65, 70 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref’d). 11 employee who had mutual use and control over the vehicle he was driving had authority to give consent to search it without assistance or permission from vehicle’s owner), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1051 (2002).16 While the evidence establishes that Norton was not advised that he could refuse consent, that fact, standing alone, does not render consent involuntary.

green Lynch v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (2012)

Cited (see also) · M.D. Fla. · signal: see also

Alston, 723 So.2d at 161 ; see also Dennis v. State, 817 So.2d 741, 765 (Fla.2002) (upholding CCP where facts showed defendant arrived at apartment before victim and waited for her arrival), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1051 , 123 S.Ct. 604 , 154 L.Ed.2d 527 (2002).

green Hall v. State (2012)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Dennis v. State, 817 So.2d 741, 765-66 (Fla.2002) (upholding CCP where defendant arrived at the apartment before the victim and waited for her arrival), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1051 , 123 S.Ct. 604 , 154 L.Ed.2d 527 (2002).

green Gosciminski v. State (2008)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Dennis v. State, 817 So.2d 741 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1051 , 123 S.Ct. 604 , 154 L.Ed.2d 527 (2002).

green Parker v. State (2005)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Dennis v. State, 817 So.2d 741, 758 (Fla.) ("We review a trial court's ruling on the relevance of evidence under an abuse of discretion standard."), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1051 , 123 S.Ct. 604 , 154 L.Ed.2d 527 (2002); Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 512 (Fla.2003) (explaining that "the standard of review of a motion for mistrial is the abuse of discretion standard").