How cited: Yarbrough v. Cantex Manufacturing Co. · Go Syfert

Yarbrough v. Cantex Manufacturing Co. (1958)

green · 48 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195919922026
green Sanders v. Bowen (1990)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 441 (2) ( 103 SE2d 138 ) (1958).
green Jackson v. Rodriquez (1984)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ) (1958).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ). "... [T]he proprietor of premises is not the insurer of persons thereon against all acts of co-invitees, and when said proprietor has used or exercised ordinary care to keep the premises safe, he is not guilty of negligence.
green Seal v. Aldredge (1959)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
green Allen v. Crawford (1993)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ) and cit. ‘The general test in such cases is not whether the injurious result or consequence was possible, but whether it was probable; that is, likely to occur according to the usual experience of persons.’ Whitaker v. Jones [&c.] Co., 69 Ga. App. 711, 716 ( 26 SE2d 545 ).” Covington v. S. H.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ) and cit.’ ” Covington v. S. H.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 441 (2) ( 103 SE2d 138 ); Camp v. Camp, 213 Ga. 65 ( 97 SE2d 125 ); and Martin v. Baldwin, 215 Ga. 293 (2), 297-300 ( 110 SE2d 344 ), opinions of medical experts (whose qualifications are not first proved) are not allowed as a part of business records.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ).” Wright v. Shoney’s of Savannah, 141 Ga. App. 362, 363 ( 233 SE2d 474 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ) and cit. 'The general test in such cases is not whether the injurious result or consequence was possible, but whether it was probable; that is, likely to occur according to the usual experience of persons.’ Whitaker v. Jones, McDougald, Smith, Pew Co., 69 Ga. App. 711, 716 ( 26 SE2d 545 ).” Covington v. S. H.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 440 ( 103 SE2d 138 ). 3.
green Stubbs v. Daughtry (1967)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 441 (2) ( 103 SE2d 138 ); Hawkins v. Jackson, 97 Ga. App. 525 (3) ( 103 SE2d 634 ); Meeks v. Lunsford, 106 Ga. App. 154 (1) ( 126 SE2d 531 )), the admission of the report was not error.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 97 Ga. App. 438, 442 ( 103 SE2d 138 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
green Reeves v. Madray (1960)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.