How cited: Harper v. Plunkett · Go Syfert

Harper v. Plunkett (1970)

green · 35 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197019982026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Unless defendant was *444 going to pay the doctor's bill, it was not within his province to direct the plaintiff to go and see a doctor; further, unless he was negligent, and therefore liable, his liability insurance would not "take care of it." Sims v. Martin, 33 Ga. App. 486 (1) ( 126 SE 872 ); Rentz v. Collins, 51 Ga. App. 782 (2) ( 181 SE 678 ); Wade v. Drinkard, 76 Ga. App. 159 (5) ( 45 SE2d 231 ); Young v. Carter, 121 Ga. App. 191, 192 ( 173 SE2d 259 ); Harper v. Plunk…
green Piggee v. Gaskin (2021)
Quote Authority · S.D. Ga.
Res. v. Bulbalia, 694 S.E.2d 115 , 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010); see also Bussey v. Dawson, 160 S.E.2d 834, 836 (Ga. 1968) (similar); Harper v. Plunkett, 176 S.E.2d 187, 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970) (“It has been held time and again that all questions of negligence are for the jury's determination except in plain and palpable cases”) (citation omitted); cf. Brown, 2021 WL 3376827 at *4.
“It has been held time and again that all questions of negligence are for the jury's determination except in plain and palpable cases”
green Dockery v. Sharpe (2021)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ga.
Res. v. Bulbalia, 694 S.E.2d 115 , 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010); see also Bussey v. Dawson, 160 S.E.2d 834, 836 (Ga. 1968) (similar); Harper v. Plunkett, 176 S.E.2d 187, 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970) (“It has been held time and again that all questions of negligence are for the jury's determination except in plain and palpable cases” (citation omitted)); cf. Brown, 2021 WL 3376827 at *4.
“It has been held time and again that all questions of negligence are for the jury's determination except in plain and palpable cases” (citation omitted)
Quote Authority · S.D. Ga.
Res. v. Bulbalia, 694 S.E.2d 115 , 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010) (“[Q]uestions of negligence . . . are peculiarly matters for the jury, and a court should not take the place of the jury in solving them, except in plain and indisputable cases.”) (alteration in original) (quoting Bussey v. Dawson, 160 S.E.2d 834, 836 (Ga. 1968)); Harper v. Plunkett, 176 S.E.2d 187, 188 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970) (“It has been held time and again that all questions of negligence are for the jury’s determina…
“It has been held time and again that all questions of negligence are for the jury’s determination except in plain and palpable cases.”
green Otto v. Hendry (1974)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Long Construction Co. v. Ryals, 102 Ga. App. 66 (1) ( 115 SE2d 726 ); Harper v. Plunkett, 122 Ga. App. 63, 64 ( 176 SE2d 187 ); Chastain v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 122 Ga. App. 90 (2) ( 176 SE2d 487 ).
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Harper v. Plunkett, 122 Ga. App. 63 ( 176 SE2d 187 ); Robertson v. Jackson, 123 Ga. App. 623 ( 181 SE2d 905 ); and Brown v. Nutter, 125 Ga. App. 449, 450 (3) ( 188 SE2d 133 ).
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Harper v. Plunkett, 122 Ga. App. 63 ( 176 SE2d 187 ); Robertson v. Jackson, 123 Ga. App. 623 ( 181 SE2d 905 ); and Brown v. Nutter, 125 Ga. App. 449, 450 (3) ( 188 SE2d 133 ).