How cited: Tidwell v. State · Go Syfert

Tidwell v. State (1994)

green · 32 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199520102026
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 5 citations in this opinion
And as stated by the Supreme Court and consistently held by this Court, in the absence of an express, statutorily-defined mens rea element, the 6 allegation of criminal intent is “necessarily inferred” from an indictment that “charges [an] offense in the language of the statute and alleges it was committed ‘unlawfully.’” Humphrey v. State, 231 Ga. 855, 861 (IV) ( 204 SE2d 603 ) (1974); see also Tidwell v. State, 216 Ga. App. 8, 10 (1) ( 453 SE2d 64 ) (1994) (“The allegation …
“The allegation that the men acted ‘unlawfully,’ with reference to the specific Code section which made the conduct unlawful, sufficiently included the intent to commit the criminal act and the knowledge necessary to form such intent.”
green Klaub v. State (2002)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Scott v. State, 230 Ga.App. 522, 525 (2), 496 S.E.2d 494 (1998); Tidwell v. State, 216 Ga.App. 8, 12 (5), 453 S.E.2d 64 (1994); Dworkin v. State, 210 Ga.App. 461 , 436 S.E.2d 665 (1994); Burden v. State, 187 Ga.App. 778 , 371 S.E.2d 410 (1988).
green Swanson v. State (2001)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Tidwell v. State, 216 Ga. App. 8, 10 (1) ( 453 SE2d 64 ) (1995) (allegation that the defendants’ actions “resulted” in the victim’s death adequately asserted proximate cause). 3.
green Sevostiyanova v. State (2012)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
(Citations omitted.) Tidwell v. State, 216 Ga. App. 8, 10 (1) ( 453 SE2d 64 ) (1994).
green Pulliam v. State (2011)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Further, OCGA § 40-6-270 (a) specifically provides that “[t]he driver shall in every event remain at the scene of the accident until fulfilling the requirements of this subsection.” 10 Tidwell v. State, 216 Ga. App. 8, 10 (1) ( 453 SE2d 64 ) (1994). 11 Hovis v. State, 260 Ga. App. 278, 281 (1) (a) ( 582 SE2d 127 ) (2003). 12 (Footnote omitted.) Harridge v. State, 243 Ga. App. 658, 664 (5) ( 534 SE2d 113 ) (2000). 13 Id. 14 Fluellen v. State, 284 Ga. App. 584 ( 644 SE2d 486 )…
green State v. Pendergrass (2009)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Smith, P J., and Bernes, J., concur. 1 OCGA § 17-7-54 (a). 2 Dunbar v. State, 209 Ga. App. 97, 98 (2) ( 432 SE2d 829 ) (1993) (citations and punctuation omitted). 3 OCGA § 16-5-3 (a). 4 OCGA § 16-5-60 (b). 5 See Dunbar, supra. 6 See Lowe v. State, 276 Ga. 538, 540 (2) ( 579 SE2d 728 ) (2003); Smith v. State, 249 Ga. App. 39, 42 (2) ( 547 SE2d 598 ) (2001); Tidwell v. State, 216 Ga. App. 8, 10 (1) ( 453 SE2d 64 ) (1994). 7 See Kain v. State, 287 Ga. App. 45, 49 (2) ( 650 SE2d…
green Smith v. State (2009)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
State, 216 Ga. App. 8, 12 (4) ( 453 SE2d 64 ) (1994); Mitchell v. State, 233 Ga. App. 92, 95 (5) ( 503 SE2d 293 ) (1998).
green Augustin v. State (2003)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g. · 5 citations in this opinion
Eldridge and Mikell, JJ., concur. 1 OCGA §§ 40-6-273; 40-6-270; 40-6-10 (b); 40-6-48; 40-6-123. 2 Smith v. State, 267 Ga. 502, 503 (3) ( 480 SE2d 838 ) (1997). 3 Id. 4 See Nolan v. State, 255 Ga. App. 63, 64 (1) ( 564 SE2d 464 ) (2002). 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 Thompson v. State, 243 Ga. App. 878, 881 (2) ( 534 SE2d 151 ) (2000). 8 See Miller v. State, 243 Ga. App. 764, 769 (16) ( 533 SE2d 787 ) (2000). 9 OCGA § 40-6-270. 10 OCGA § 40-6-10 (b). 11 Hoffer v. State, 192 Ga. App. 378, 380