How cited: Solomon v. Shuell · Go Syfert

Solomon v. Shuell (1990)

green · 186 citation events across 10 courts. Showing the 30 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Quote Authority · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 129 , 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (“Under MRE 805, hearsay within hearsay is excluded where no foundation has been established to bring each independent hearsay statement within a hearsay exception.”).
“Under MRE 805, hearsay within hearsay is excluded where no foundation has been established to bring each independent hearsay statement within a hearsay exception.”
green People v. Gursky (2010)
Rule Authority · Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Solomon, 435 Mich at 148 (Boyle, J., concurring), citing Swartz v Dow Chem, 414 Mich 433, 442 ; 326 NW2d 804 (1982).
Boyle, J., concurring
Rule Authority · W. Va. · 2 citations in this opinion
Solomon v. Shuell, 435 Mich. 104 , 457 N.W.2d 669, 677 (Mich.1990) (" Palmer has subsequently been read to stand for the proposition that the trial court, in its discretion, may exclude evidence meeting the literal requirements of the business records exception where the underlying circumstances indicate a lack of the trustworthiness business records are presumed to have").
green People v. Malone (1994)
Rule Authority · Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cf. n 5. [10] Consistent with this intention, this Court has continued to look to the commentary on the Federal Rules of Evidence, see, e.g., People v VanderVliet, 444 Mich 52, 60, n 7 ; 508 NW2d 114 (1993), and decisions interpreting these rules, see, e.g., Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 108-139, 140-153 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (opinions of ARCHER and BOYLE, JJ.). [11] See, e.g., cases collected in anno: Admissibility of evidence as to extrajudicial or pretrial identificatio…
green Wassillie v. State (2018)
Rule Authority · Alaska
App. 1977); Solomon v. Shuell, 457 N.W.2d 669, 678-82 (Mich. 1990). 32 See, e.g., Bracey v. Herringa, 466 F.2d 702, 703-05 (7th Cir. 1972) (holding that business records exception did not apply to prison records, including guards’ “conduct reports,” that “included the self-serving statements of the defendants” and other guards potentially subject to liability); People v. Smith, 565 N.E.2d 900 , 912­ 17 (Ill. 1990) (finding that prison incident reports lacked the trustworthin…
Rule Authority · D. Wyo.
See, e.g., Frederick v. Mobil Oil Corp., 765 F.2d 442, 446 (5th Cir.1985) (stating that, under Louisiana law, a plaintiff can recover under the rescue doctrine if the rescued person "was or appeared to be in imminent peril”); Trapp v. Vess, 847 So.2d 304, 307 (Ala.2002) (holding that a plaintiff can recover under the rescue doctrine if “he had a reasonable belief that the person he was trying to rescue was in a dangerous position”); Lambert v. Palrish, 467 N.E.2d 791, 799 (I…
holding that “the rescue doctrine applies even if the victim never was in actual danger”
green People v. McDaniel (2003)
Rule Authority · Mich.
Palmer v Hoffman, 318 US 109, 113-114 ; 63 S Ct 477 ; 87 L Ed 2d 645 (1943); Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 120-121, 130, 132 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990).
green Brown v. State (2001)
Rule Authority · Ga.
App. 3d 442, 444 ( 688 NE2d 1206 ) (1997); Bacher v. State, 686 NE2d 791, n. 4 (Ind. 1997); State v. Smith, 594 S2d 467, 476 (La. 1991); Solomon v. Shuell, 435 Mich. 104, 139 ( 457 NW2d 669 ) (1990); Snyder v. Portland Traction Co., 182 Ore. 344, 351 ( 185 P2d 563 ) (1947); State v. Bertul, 664 P2d 1181, 1184 (Utah 1983).
Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.
Solomon v. Shuell, 166 Mich. App. 19, 25 , 420 N.W.2d 160, 164 (1988), rev'd on other grounds, 435 Mich. 104, 139 , 457 N.W.2d 669, 684 (1990).
Rule Authority · N.M.
See, e.g., Zimny v. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc., 8 Conn.App. 407, 420 , 513 A.2d 1235, 1243 (causal aspect of rescue doctrine remains viable under comparative negligence), cert. denied, 201 Conn. 811 , 516 A.2d 887 (1986); Solomon v. Shuell, 435 Mich. 104, 135 , 457 N.W.2d 669, 683 (1990) (same); Sweetman v. State Highway Dep’t, 137 Mich.App. 14, 26 , 357 N.W.2d 783, 789 (1984) (same); Pachesky v. Getz, 353 Pa.Super. 505 , 519 n. 8, 510 A.2d 776 , 783 n. 8 (1986) (same).
same
green Merrow v. Bofferding (1998)
Cited · Mich. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Solomon v. Shuell, 435 Mich. 104, 119 , 457 N.W.2d 669 (1990); People v. Meeboer (After Remand), 439 Mich. 310, 322 , 484 N.W.2d 621 (1992).
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally Wigmore, Evidence (Chadbourn rev), § 1420-1423, pp 251-255; see also Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 119-120 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990).
green People v. Meeboer (1992)
Cited · Mich. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 119 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990); 5 Wigmore, Evidence (Chadbourn rev), § 1420, p 251.
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 128-129 ; 456 NW2d 669 (1990) (holding that a report summarizing a conversation between the report’s author and another person was hearsay within hearsay).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon, 435 Mich at 125 - 126.
green In Re Wilson Minors (2024)
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 125-126 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990).
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 128-129 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990); MRE 805.
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See id.
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 139 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See generally Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 120 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (recognizing, in the context of the records exception, that when “the source of information or the person preparing the report has a motivation to misrepresent, trustworthiness can no longer be presumed . . . .”).
green in Re Verga Estate (2021)
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 127-128 ; 475 NW2d 669 (1990).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 130 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (opinion by ARCHER, J.) (stating that “MRE 803(8)(A) is limited to ‘records or reports’ describing the general activities of an 10 Chapman sought medical attention for a foot infection while living at the rental property, but there is no evidence that this was caused by the alleged presence of mold at the rental property. -29- agency per se”), and Hewitt v Grand Trunk Western R Co, 123 Mich App 309, 326 ; 333 NW2d…
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 130 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (opinion by ARCHER, J.) (stating that “MRE 803(8)(A) is limited to ‘records or reports’ describing the general activities of an 10 Chapman sought medical attention for a foot infection while living at the rental property, but there is no evidence that this was caused by the alleged presence of mold at the rental property. -29- agency per se”), and Hewitt v Grand Trunk Western R Co, 123 Mich App 309, 326 ; 333 NW2d…
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomen v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 139 (opinion by ARCHER, J.), 143 (opinion by BOYLE, J.); 457 NW2d 669 (1990); Attorney General v John A Biewer Co, Inc, 140 Mich App 1, 17 ; 363 NW2d 712 (1985).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomen v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 139 (opinion by ARCHER, J.), 143 (opinion by BOYLE, J.); 457 NW2d 669 (1990); Attorney General v John A Biewer Co, Inc, 140 Mich App 1, 17 ; 363 NW2d 712 (1985).
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 128-133 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (opinion of ARCHER, J.); Tanner, 222 Mich App at 630 .
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104, 128-133 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990) (opinion of ARCHER, J.); Tanner, 222 Mich App at 630 .
green Roberts v. Vaughn (1998)
Cited (see also) · Mich. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990); Prosser & Keeton, Torts (5th ed), § 44, pp 307-308; 2 Restatement Torts, 2d, § 472, p 521; Wagner v Int’l R Co, 232 NY 176, 180 ; 133 NE 437 (1921) (“Danger invites rescue”). 9 The parties argued, and we decide, this case on the basis of record evidence indicating that plaintiff received no compensation from the township.
green People v. Hoffman (1994)
Cited (see also) · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see also
See also Solomon v Shuell, 435 Mich 104 ; 457 NW2d 669 (1990).
green People v. Stacy (1992)
Cited · Mich. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Justice Archer’s opinion in Solomon, supra, p 132 , stating that "trustworthiness is the cardinal justification for the admissibility of public records” and concluding that a motivation to misrepresent or other circumstances creating the absence of trustworthiness affect admissibility under MRE 803(8).