Brodie v. Champion (2006)
green
· 10 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 3 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
RAFFENSPERGER v. JACKSON (And Vice Versa) (2023)
First, in order to establish that the Act violates their due process rights under the Georgia Constitution to pursue their chosen occupation free from unreasonable government interference, challengers bear the burden of establishing that the Act “manifestly 17 infringes upon a constitutional provision or violates the rights of the people.” Brodie v. Champion, 281 Ga. 105, 106 ( 636 SE2d 511 ) (2006); see also Zarate-Martinez v. Echemendia, 299 Ga. 301, 305 ( 788 SE2d 405 ) (…
And, “[w]here the election is held in substantial compliance with the law, it should not be rendered void merely because of isolated failures to conform strictly with the law unless it appears that such failures changed the results of the election.” Id. (citation and punctuation omitted). 14 Smith’s reliance on Brodie v. Champion, 281 Ga. 105, 106-07 (636 SE2d 511) (2006), is misplaced.
green
Rhodes v. State (2008)
II (“No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.”). 5 OCGA § 40-6-391 (c) (1) (B). 6 OCGA § 40-6-391 (c) (1) (A), (C). 7 Ga. Dept. of Human Resources v. Sweat, 276 Ga. 627,628 ( 580 SE2d 206 ) (2003); Dawson v. State, 274 Ga. 327, 328 ( 554 SE2d 137 ) (2001). 8 Brodie v. Champion, 281 Ga. 105,106 ( 636 SE2d 511 ) (2006); Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850, 852 ( 472 SE2d 74 ) (1996).