How cited: Redd v. Peters · Go Syfert

Redd v. Peters (1959)

green · 28 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196119932026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co., 174 Ga. App. 525, 530 (2) ( 330 SE2d 753 ) (1985); Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 321 (3) ( 111 SE2d 132 ) (1959).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Furthermore, those cases recognized the principles which we have reiterated here; for, as held in one of those cases, Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 320 ( 111 SE2d 132 ): “It is further contended that the court’s charge on the measure of damages was error for the reason that he failed to give any ascertainable rule for fixing the amount of damages.
green Barnes v. Cornett (1975)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
It was held in Reed v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 322 (4), supra, that it is proper to charge the jury that continued pain without improvement can indicate the injury is permanent.
green Upshaw v. Cooper (1972)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 318 ( 111 SE2d 132 ).
green Hogan v. Malcom (1963)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316, 318 ( 111 SE2d 132 ).
green Ray v. Stinson (1984)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Redd v. Peters, 100 Ga. App. 316 (1), supra. Accordingly, we find that the verdict of the jury awarding plaintiff no amount for pain and suffering is neither “illogical and inconsistent” nor “inadequate”; nor is it “unsupported by the evidence.” “ ‘The presumptions are in favor of the validity of verdicts, and if possible a construction will be given which will uphold them. [Cit.] Even if the verdict is ambiguous . . . and susceptible of two constructions, one of which w…