How cited: Stange v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. · Go Syfert

Stange v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. (1994)

green · 41 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199420102026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 732 (1) ( 440 SE2d 503 ) (1994).
green Purvis v. Ballantine (1997)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
This rule has equal force in defamation cases.” Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 732 (1) ( 440 SE2d 503 ) (1994). *251 Decided April 23, 1997.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
This Court, however, has quoted or applied the substantial truth language originating from Masson numerous times and these decisions trace back to two decisions: Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 735 ( 440 SE2d 503 ) (1994) (public official case), and Brewer v. Roberts, 211 Ga. App. 343, 347 (2) (a) ( 439 SE2d 77 ) (1993) (public figure case).8 Not all of these decisions, however, are ones in which the First Amendment 8 The progeny of Stange and Brewer, listed in …
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Elliott, for appellees. 1 Evans also listed a John Doe defendant. 2 Evans’s complaint alleges defamation, but because his claims specifically relate to a published newspaper article, we analyze his claim under OCGA § 51-5-2 (newspaper libel). 3 (Punctuation omitted.) Lucas v. Cranshaw, 289 Ga. App. 510 ( 659 SE2d 612 ) (2008). 4 (Punctuation omitted.) Bollea v. World Championship Wrestling, 271 Ga. App. 555, 556 ( 610 SE2d 92 ) (2005). 5 (Punctuation omitted.) Id. 6 Haywood …
green Wolf v. Ramsey (2003)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ga.
Enters., Inc., 211 Ga.App. 731, 734 , 440 S.E.2d 503, 507 (1994).
green Gardner v. Boatright (1995)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
The nonmoving party cannot then rest on its pleadings, but rather must point to specific evidence giving rise to a triable issue. [Cit.]” Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 732 (1) ( 440 SE2d 503 ) (1994).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 735 ( 440 SE2d 503 ), citing St.
green Schafer v. Time, Inc. (1998)
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Stange v. Cox Enter., 211 Ga. App. 731, 733-34 , 440 S.E.2d 503, 506-07 (1994) (discussing the steps a publisher took to check the accuracy of a story and editorial).
discussing the steps a publisher took to check the accuracy of a story and editorial
green Schafer v. Time, Inc. (1998)
Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Stange v. Cox Enter., 211 Ga.App. 731, 733-34 , 440 S.E.2d 503, 506-07 (1994) (discussing the steps a publisher took to check the accuracy of a story and editorial).
discussing the steps a publisher took to check the accuracy of a story and editorial
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Stange v. Cox Enterprises, Inc. , 211 Ga. App. 731 , 733 (2), 440 S.E.2d 503 (1994) (steps reporter undertook to investigate matter corroborated his assertion of good faith and belief in the truth of his statements). *460 We also find that Ladner has failed to carry his burden of presenting evidence to create a jury question on the issue of actual malice.
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Jaillett, supra, 238 Ga. App. at 888 ; see also Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 735 (2) ( 440 SE2d 503 ) (1994) (failure to explain that plaintiff was not a named defendant in separate civil suit and variance in number of persons who alleged they were deceived by plaintiff were minor errors).
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Stange v. Cox Enterprises, 211 Ga. App. 731, 732 (1) ( 440 SE2d 503 ) (1994). 2.