Roberson v. Teel (1973)
green
· 23 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
See, e.g., Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz. App. 439 , 513 P.2d 977 (1973) (tolling of statute of limitations ends upon death of incompetent); In re Hoenig's Estate, 230 Iowa 718 , 298 N.W. 887 (1941) (disability on account of minority terminated by minor's death); Fletcher v. Holcomb, 142 Kan. 177 , 45 P.2d 1053 (1935) (incompetent's disability removed by his death); Martin v. Goodman, 126 Okl. 34 , 258 P. 871 (1927) (disability of minor to sue terminates at death of minor).
tolling of statute of limitations ends upon death of incompetent
green
Wanda Williams, etc. v. CMO Management, LLC (2016)
See Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz.App. 439 , 513 P.2d 977, 988 (1973) (stating that “where a statute of limitation' is tolled because of incompetency, the tolling of the statute ends upon the death of the incompetent”).
stating that “where a statute of limitation' is tolled because of incompetency, the tolling of the statute ends upon the death of the incompetent”
green
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. (2012)
See Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz.App. 439, 449 , 513 P.2d 977, 987 (1973) (stating that, under Dockery, extrinsic fraud “is grounds for a collateral attack upon the judgment”). ¶ 62 In this case, the Taylor documents not only revealed evidence of possible breaches of fiduciary duty on the part of Phoenix Holdings, but also contained previously undiscovered evidence not considered by this court of collusion and conspiracy between Phoenix Holdings and Breyeliffe.
stating that, under Dockery, extrinsic fraud “is grounds for a collateral attack upon the judgment”
green
Mack-Evans v. Hilltop Healthcare Center, Inc. (2010)
See also Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz.App. 439 , 513 P.2d 977, 988 (1973) (“The question thus presented ... is when does this statute of limitations begin to run as to an incompetent who dies without being restored to competency?
green
MacK-evans v. HILLTOP HEALTHCARE CENTER (2010)
See also Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz.App. 439 , 513 P.2d 977, 988 (1973) ("The question thus presented. . . is when does this statute of limitations begin to run as to an incompetent who dies without being restored to competency?
green
Holmes v. Spector (2023)
See Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz. App. 439, 445 (1973) (affirming summary judgment against granddaughter of decedent who filed separate suit to challenge probate court’s unappealed order distributing decedent’s assets; probate court’s order “is conclusive except on appeal, and is not subject to collateral attack.”) (citation omitted). ¶9 As to the court’s order allowing Spector and Hall to file an answer and not a counterclaim, we note that counterclaims are not allowed in evic…
affirming summary judgment against granddaughter of decedent who filed separate suit to challenge probate court’s unappealed order distributing decedent’s assets; probate court’s order “is conclusive except on appeal, and is not subject to collateral attack.”