How cited: Nunn v. Allen · Go Syfert

Nunn v. Allen (2002)

green · 82 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 21
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200520152026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Fish v. Stetina (2025)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 7 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 535 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 43 (2002) (quoting Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C.
quoting Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 380 , 477 S.E.2d 234, 237 (1996)
green Clark v. Clark (2021)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 533 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 42 (2002) (citing Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C.
citing Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377 , 477 S.E.2d 234 (1996)
green Ponder v. Been (2020)
Quote Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 534 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 42 (2002) (“Under Pharr, supra, post-separation conduct is admissible and relevant to corroborate evidence of pre-separation conduct, and the evidence of post-separation conduct here provides strong circumstantial evidence explaining and corroborating defendant’s pre-separation conduct.”).
“Under Pharr, supra, post-separation conduct is admissible and relevant to corroborate evidence of pre-separation conduct, and the evidence of post-separation conduct here provides strong circumstantial evidence explaining and corroborating defendant’s pre-separation conduct.”
green State v. Massey (2014)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 530 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 40 (2002) (“This Court has no authority to overrule decisions of the North Carolina Supreme Court.” (citation omitted)).
“This Court has no authority to overrule decisions of the North Carolina Supreme Court.” (citation omitted)
green Smallwood v. Smallwood (2013)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 531 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 41 (2002) (holding appellant was not entitled to new trial where he “neither argued nor demonstrated that he was prejudiced by” trial court’s evidentiary ruling), disc, review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
holding appellant was not entitled to new trial where he “neither argued nor demonstrated that he was prejudiced by” trial court’s evidentiary ruling
green Kor Xiong v. Marks (2008)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 530 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 40 (2002), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
green Misenheimer v. Burris (2005)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 523, 535 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 43 (2002) (quoting Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C.
quoting Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 380 , 477 S.E.2d 234, 237 (1996)
green Beavers v. McMican (2022)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 533 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 41-42 (2002) (marks and citations omitted), disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
marks and citations omitted
green Beavers v. McMican (2022)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 533 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 41-42 (2002) (marks and citations omitted), disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
marks and citations omitted
green Hampton v. Hearn (2020)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 541 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 46 (2002).
green Hampton v. Hearn (2020)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 541 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 46 (2002).
green Chisum v. Campagna (2019)
Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.
App. 523, 541 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 46 (2002)) (quotation marks omitted). 140.
green Price v. Jones (2014)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 535 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 43 (2002), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
green Puryear v. Puryear (2014)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 530 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 40 (2002) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
green Heller v. Somdahl (2010)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 533 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 42 (2002), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003); see generally Palsgraf v. Long Island R.
green Jones v. Skelley (2009)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 536 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 43-44 (2002), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
green Boileau v. Seagrave (2008)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 533 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 41 (2002), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 675 , 577 S.E.2d 630 (2003).
green Fox v. Gibson (2006)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 523, 535-36 , 574 S.E.2d 35, 43-44 (2002); Horner v. Byrnett, 132 N.C.
green Clark v. Clark (2021)
Cited (see also) · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see also
App. at 446 , 784 S.E.2d at 615 (citation omitted) (alteration in original); see also Nunn, 154 N.C.
green Slattery v. Appycity, LLC (2021)
Cited · N.C. Bus. Ct. · signal: see
See Nunn v. Allen, 154 N.C.
green Dolin v. Kindred (2019)
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.C. · signal: see also
See, e.g., McCutchen v. McCutchen, 360 N.C. 280, 283 (2006) (citation omitted) (holding that to establish a claim for alienation of affection, plaintiff must allege that “‘(1) [t]hat [she and her husband] were happily married, and that a genuine love and affection existed between them; (2) that the love and affection so existing was alienated and destroyed; [and] (3) that the wrongful and malicious acts of the defendant[] produced and brought about the loss and alienation of…
citation omitted