Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co. (1992)

green · 319 citation events across 23 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199220092026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Morgan's Ferry Productions, LLC v. Rudd (2001)

Quote Authority · 4th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b); see also Rowan County, 418 S.E.2d at 659 (“There is a requirement of specificity as to the element of a representation made by the alleged defrauder.

“There is a requirement of specificity as to the element of a representation made by the alleged defrauder. The representation must be definite and specific.”

green Christopher's AZ v. Duncan (2000)

Quote Authority · 4th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Fox, 141 S.E.2d at 526 (recognizing ques- tion of reliance on seller's representations is for the jury); Rowan, 418 S.E.2d at 658 ("[I]t is inappropriate to grant motions for directed ver- dict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict if there is evidence that supports the plaintiff's prima facie case in all its constituent ele- ments.").

"[I]t is inappropriate to grant motions for directed ver- dict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict if there is evidence that supports the plaintiff's prima facie case in all its constituent ele- ments."

green Hart v. State (2015)

Quote Authority · N.C. · 4 citations in this opinion

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 10 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 655 (1992) (“Education is a governmental function so fundamental in this state that our constitution contains a separate article entitled ‘Education.’ ”); Delconte v. State, 313 N.C. 384, 401-02 , 329 S.E.2d 636, 647 (1985) (“We also recognize that the state has a compelling interest in seeing that children are educated and may, constitutionally, establish minimum educational requirements and standards for thi…

“Education is a governmental function so fundamental in this state that our constitution contains a separate article entitled ‘Education.’ ”

green Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc. (2006)

Quote Authority · N.C. · 4 citations in this opinion

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 9 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 654 (1992) ("The legislature's inactivity in the face of the Court's repeated pronouncements [on an issue] can only be interpreted as acquiescence by, and implicit approval from, that body."); see also State v. Jones, 358 N.C. 473, 484 , 598 S.E.2d 125, 132 (2004) ("We presume, as we must, that the General Assembly had full knowledge of the judiciary's long standing practice.

"The legislature's inactivity in the face of the Court's repeated pronouncements [on an issue] can only be interpreted as acquiescence by, and implicit approval from, that body."

green The Town of Black Mountain v. Lexon Insurance Company (2014)

Quote Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

Bd. of Educ. v. United -11- States Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1 , 418 S.E.2d 648 (1992) (“Rowan II”), our Courts analyzed the doctrine of nullum tempus in North Carolina and developed a framework for its application.

“Rowan II”

green Schmidt v. Breeden (1999)

Quote Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Rowan County Bd. of Education v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 10 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 654-55 (1992) (“[education is a governmental function so fundamental in this state that our constitution contains a separate article entitled ‘Education’ ” [and] “the construction and maintenance of local public schools by a local school board is ... a governmental function”); see also Hickman, 108 N.C.

“[education is a governmental function so fundamental in this state that our constitution contains a separate article entitled ‘Education’ ” [and] “the construction and maintenance of local public schools by a local school board is ... a governmental function”

green Zhang v. Capitalnexus, LLC (2026)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Doe v. Fulton (2026)

Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1 , 10–11, 418 S.E.2d 648, 655 (1992) - 17 - DOE V.

green Exela Pharma Scis., LLC v. Rei Automation, Inc. (2026)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Hart v. Dwm Advisors, LLC (2026)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (citation omitted).

citation omitted

green Jennifer L. Parson, individually and as an Administrator of the Estate of Michael Bradley Parson, deceased v.… (2026)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (N.C. 1992)).

green Bear Investments, LLC v. Penn National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Fraud Under North Carolina law, “[t]he essential elements of fraud are: 1) false representation or concealment of a material fact, 2) reasonably calculated to deceive, 3) made with intent to deceive, 4) which does in fact deceive, 5) resulting in damage to the injured party.” Rowan County Board of Education v. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green State v. Daw (2024)

Rule Authority · N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 9 (1992)); see also -69- STATE V.

green Eco Fiber Inc. v. Yukon Packaging, LLC (2024)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Further Festivals, LLC v. Etix, Inc. (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 659 (1992); see Glob.

green Terracino v. Trimaco, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Under North Carolina law, “[t]he essential elements of fraud are: 1) false representation or concealment of a material fact, 2) reasonably calculated to deceive, 3) made with intent to deceive, 4) which does in fact deceive, 5) resulting in damage to the injured party.” Rowan County Board of Education v. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).4 In addition to these five elements, “any reliance on the allegedly false representations must be reasonable.” Forbis v. Neal, 361 N.C. 51…

green Maxwell Foods, LLC v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Merrell v. Smith (2023)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992)). “[A]ny reliance on alleged false representations must be reasonable.

green Blackman v. Boston Whaler, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332N.C. 1, 17, 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992); Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 83 , 273 S.E.2d 674, 677 (1981); Ragsdale v. Kennedy, 286 N.C. 130, 138 , 209 S.E.2d 494, 500 (1974); C.F.R.

green Jcg & Assocs., LLC v. Disaster Am. USA, LLC (2022)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (listing the essential elements of fraud); (Compl. ¶¶ 71–93; Amendment Compl. ¶¶ 211–29).

listing the essential elements of fraud

green Tribike Transp., LLC v. Essick (2022)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Freeman v. HKA Enterprises of South Carolina, LLC (2022)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (characterizing the fourth element as “reliance”).

characterizing the fourth element as “reliance”

green Hart v. First Oak Wealth Mgmt., LLC (2022)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted)); Aldridge v. Metro.

green Jerman v. AT&T Corporation (2022)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (N.C. 1992) (internal citations omitted).

internal citations omitted

green McFee v. Presley (2022)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Guzman (2022)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992)).

green Columbus Life Ins. Co. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2022)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992). 31.

green Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Guzman (2022)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992)).

green Cummings v. Carroll (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C.

Once again, we conclude that the Court of Appeals reached the correct decision with respect to this issue. 5 Although plaintiffs identified Mr. Carroll’s assertion that he would buy the house as evidence of fraud, the Court of Appeals concluded that this statement constituted “mere puffing” rather than actionable fraud, having reached this result in reliance upon Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Cummings v. Carroll (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C.

green Avadim Health, Inc. v. Daybreak Cap. Partners, LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (quoting Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 83 (1981)) (cleaned up). 74.

quoting Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 83 (1981)

green Potts v. Kel, LLC (2021)

Quote Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 23 (1992) (“Because [defendant] did not object to the verdict form, and indeed consented to it, it will not be heard to complain on appeal.”).

“Because [defendant] did not object to the verdict form, and indeed consented to it, it will not be heard to complain on appeal.”

green Kbt Realty Servs., Inc. v. Appycity, LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (cleaned up).

cleaned up

green Floyd v. On the Rox Entertainment LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

U.S. Gypsum Co., 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992)).

green Dodge v. Appalachian Energy, LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992)).

green Bryant v. Core Contents Restoration, LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. United States Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992) (“The essential elements of fraud are: (1) [flalse representation or concealment of a material fact, (2) reasonably calculated to deceive, (3) made with intent to deceive, (4) which does in fact deceive, (5) resulting in damage to the injured party.” (internal quotation marks and 18 citation omitted)), and that these allegations put Defendants—at least Yvonne and CC,!? see Taft v. Brinley’s…

“The essential elements of fraud are: (1) [flalse representation or concealment of a material fact, (2) reasonably calculated to deceive, (3) made with intent to deceive, (4) which does in fact deceive, (5

green Slattery v. Appycity, LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992) (cleaned up).

cleaned up

green Haddock v. Volunteers of Am., Inc. (2021)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992) (citations omitted).

citations omitted

green Ashe Cnty. v. Ashe Cnty. Plan. Bd. (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C.

In “grant[ing] Appalachian Materials a special exemption from [these presumptions],” Ashe County asserts that the Court of Appeals’ decision “taxes non-participating citizens with . . . paying for a [n]ew [s]ystem of interlocutory appeals that protects applicants claiming ignorance of both the law and the limited authority of local government officials” and requires them to pay “to restructure local governments to establish an entirely new tracking system of preliminary comm…

green Quidore v. All. Plastics, LLC (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 659 (1992) (“Requiring proof of a specific representation facilitates courts in distinguishing mere puffing, guesses, or assertions of opinions from representations of material facts.”); Beam v. Sunset Fin.

green Trident Atlanta, LLC v. Charlie Graingers Franchising, LLC (2020)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 (1992).

green Brown v. Secor (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992).

green Asr v. Giordano (2020)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (N.C. 1992).

green Asr v. Kincaid (2020)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (N.C. 1992).

green Lunsford v. Viaone Servs., LLC, 2020 Ncbc 78a (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992) (citations omitted).

citations omitted

green Brewer v. Grue (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992).

green Bucci v. Burns (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992).

green Value Health Sols. Inc. v. Pharm. Research Assocs. (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992)). 29.

green Gurkin v. Sofield (2020)

Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.

Bd. of Educ. v. United States Gypsum Co., 332 N.C. 1, 17 , 418 S.E.2d 648, 659 (1992), Plaintiff’s allegations are sufficient at this time to survive a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

green Carlton v. First Tennessee Bank National Association (2020)

Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.

The essential elements of fraud or fraud in the inducement are “(1) false representation or concealment of a material fact, (2) reasonably calculated to deceive, (3) made with intent to deceive, (4) which does in fact deceive, (5) resulting in damage to the injured party.” Rowan County Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 418 S.E.2d 648, 658 (1992).