How cited: Iteld v. Karp · Go Syfert

Iteld v. Karp (1952)

green · 25 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195319892026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Iteld v. Karp, 85 Ga. App. 835, 838 ( 70 SE2d 378 ) (1952).
green Genins v. Geiger (1977)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Here "the contract itself was merely for the legal purpose of representing a client charged with crime ... (and the attorney) may recover for the usual and necessary lawful services performed in connection therewith, although it goes without saying he cannot recover for acts contrary to public policy.. ” Iteld v. Karp, 85 Ga. App. 835, 838 ( 70 SE2d 378 ) (emphasis supplied) (unlawful acts alleged therein: attempts to suppress criminal prosecution).
green Dickey v. Mingledorff (1964)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
The recovery of attorney’s fees on a quantum meruit basis is permitted only where no fee has been agreed upon, Code § 3-107, Iteld v. Karp, 85 Ga. App. 835, 838 (1) ( 70 SE2d 378 ), or where the attorney cannot render the balance of the agreed service due to any of the contingencies provided in Code § 9-611.
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Iteld v. Karp, 85 Ga. App. 835 ( 70 SE2d 378 ).
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Iteld v. Karp, 85 Ga. App. 835 .