How cited: In Re Jm · Go Syfert

In Re Jm (2001)

green · 91 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 28 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (citation and punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied).
green In Re Je (2011)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In the final analysis, I believe that any determination that the continued deprivation will or is likely to "cause serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to [a] *19 child" [36] must necessarily include a finding of serious harm or a likelihood of serious harm in maintaining the "uneasy status quo," [37] and because I find no such harm in the case sub judice, I respectfully dissent. [38] NOTES [1] 278 Ga.App. 564 , 567(1), 629 S.E.2d 529 (2006) (emphasis in origin…
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (no testimony that the children would be seriously affected by the mother continuing to have a parental relationship with the child); In the Interest of K.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga.App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001); Beasley, 149 Ga.App. at 319 (1). 34 See In the Interest of J.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001). 10 Significantly, the record refutes the juvenile court’s finding that the father had not established or maintained a bond with the child.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (accord); In the Interest of K.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (accord); In the Interest of K.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001); In the Interest of D.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001); In the Interest of D.
green In Re Dta (2011)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
"The trial judge is to ascertain the facts and to state not only the end result of that inquiry but the process by which it was reached." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.M., 251 Ga.App. 380, 383 (4), 554 S.E.2d 533 (2001).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001).
green In Re Tp (2011)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Compare In the Interest of K.D.E., 288 Ga.App. 520, 526 (1), 654 S.E.2d 651 (2007) (noting that there was "no testimony that a continued relationship with [the] mother would result in any potential or actual harm to the child"); In the Interest of J.M., 251 Ga.App. 380, 383-384 (4), 554 S.E.2d 533 (2001) (noting that the juvenile court did not set forth any facts supporting its conclusion that continued deprivation was likely to harm the children, and that there was no evide…
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383-384 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (noting that the juvenile court did not set forth any facts supporting its conclusion that continued deprivation was likely to harm the children, and that there was no evidence in the record that the children’s relationship with their mother was harmful to them).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001); In the Interest of K.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383-384 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001).
green In Re Jk (2006)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co., 277 Ga. 189, 191 , 587 S.E.2d 24 (2003). [18] See In the Interest of K.S.W., 233 Ga.App. 144, 149 (3), 503 S.E.2d 376 (1998). [19] Id. [20] See In the Interest of C.R.G., 272 Ga.App. 161, 164-165 , 611 S.E.2d 784 (2005); In the Interest of M.E.M., 272 Ga.App. 451, 455 , 612 S.E.2d 612 (2005); In the Interest of T.G., 269 Ga.App. 278, 283-284 , 603 S.E.2d 764 (2004); In the Interest of R.S.H., 269 Ga.App. 292, 298 (a), 603 S.E.2d 675 (2004); In the Interest of S.L.B., 26…
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (no testimony that the children would be seriously affected by the mother continuing to have a parental relationship with the child); In the Interest of K.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001); Beasley v. Jones, 149 Ga. App. 317, 319 (1) ( 254 SE2d 472 ) (1979).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 381-382 (2) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001).
green In Re Vid (2002)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
NOTES [1] In the Interest of D.W.A., 253 Ga.App. 346 , 559 S.E.2d 100 (2002). [2] In the Interest of C.N.S., 248 Ga.App. 84 , 85, 545 S.E.2d 633 (2001). [3] (Footnote omitted.) In the Interest of J.M., 251 Ga.App. 380, 381-382 (2), 554 S.E.2d 533 (2001). [4] See, e.g., In the Interest of L.S.M., 236 Ga.App. 537, 538 , 512 S.E.2d 397 (1999). [5] See, e.g., In the Interest of C.L.R., 232 Ga.App. 134 (1), 501 S.E.2d 296 (1998). [6] Id. [7] See, e.g., In the Interest of N.M.H., …
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383 (4) ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001) (termination order reversed because no testimony presented that continued relationship with parent caused serious physical, mental, emotional, or moral harm to children); cf. In the Interest of M.
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380 ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001), “the lack of evidence and findings on this matter precludes us from concluding that the evidence authorized the juvenile court to find by clear and convincing evidence that the [child was] likely to suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm; thus, we are constrained to reverse.” 251 Ga. App. at 384 (4).
4
green In Re Rs (2002)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Similar to K.J. and In the Interest of J.M., 251 Ga.App. 380 , 554 S.E.2d 533 (2001), "the lack of evidence and findings on this matter precludes us from concluding that the evidence authorized the juvenile court to find by clear and convincing evidence that the [child was] likely to suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm; thus, we are constrained to reverse." 251 Ga.App. at 384 (4), 554 S.E.2d 533 .
4
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
M., 251 Ga. App. 380, 383-384 ( 554 SE2d 533 ) (2001); In the Interest of K.
green In Re JTW (2004)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See generally In the Interest of J.M., 251 Ga.App. 380 , 554 S.E.2d 533 (2001) (past history of domestic violence noted in decision reversing termination of parental rights).
past history of domestic violence noted in decision reversing termination of parental rights
green In Re Jh (2004)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., In the Interest of J.M., 251 Ga.App. 380, 383 (4), 554 S.E.2d 533 (2001) (no testimony that the children would be seriously affected by the mother continuing to have a parental relationship with the child); In the Interest of K.J., 226 Ga.App. at 309 (2)(b), 486 S.E.2d 899 (neither caseworker testified that the children were likely to suffer serious harm if parental rights were not terminated, nor was there expert testimony on point).
green In Re Jh (2002)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Also, it appears that the mother gave birth in July and that the Department was granted custody of the baby. [4] OCGA § 15-11-94(a). [5] OCGA § 15-11-94(a); see In the Interest of V.M.T., supra at 736(3), 534 S.E.2d 452 . [6] OCGA § 15-11-94(b)(4)(A); In the Interest of B.F., 253 Ga.App. 887, 890 , 560 S.E.2d 738 (2002). [7] OCGA § 15-11-94(b)(4)(C)(i)-(iii). [8] 179 Ga.App. 346 , 346 S.E.2d 121 (1986). [9] In the Interest of J.M.C., 201 Ga.App. 173, 174 , 410 S.E.2d 368 (19…