CS-Lakeview at Gwinnett, Inc. v. Retail Development Partners (2004)
green
· 27 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200720162026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Community State Bank v. Strong (2011)
Partners, 268 Ga.App. 480 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004) (quotation omitted); 23 Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 13 (1982) (“Restatement of Judgments”) (“The rules of res judicata are applicable only when a final judgment is rendered.”).
quotation omitted
green
Community State Bank v. James Strong (2011)
Partners, 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004) (quotation omitted);23 Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 13 (1982) (“Restatement of Judgments”) (“The rules of res judicata are applicable only when a final judgment is rendered.”).
quotation omitted
green
Community State Bank v. Strong (2007)
Partners, 268 Ga.App. 480 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004) (quoting Greene v. Transport Ins.
quoting Greene v. Transport Ins. Co., 169 Ga.App. 504 , 313 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1984)
green
Community State Bank v. Strong (2007)
Partners , 268 Ga.App. 480 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004) (quoting Greene v. Transport Ins.
quoting Greene v. Transport Ins. Co., 169 Ga.App. 504 , 313 S.E.2d 761, 763 (1984)
green
Jenkins v. Prime Insurance Co. (2021)
Partners, 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).
green
Jenkins v. Prime Insurance Co. (2021)
Partners, 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).
green
Rajesh C Patel (2020)
Partners, 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004)); see also Ames v. J.P.
green
Shuman v. First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation (2019)
Partners, 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004) (“It is the general rule that a judgment sought to be used as a basis for the application of the doctrine of res judicata (or collateral estoppel)4 must be a final judgment.
“It is the general rule that a judgment sought to be used as a basis for the application of the doctrine of res judicata (or collateral estoppel
green
TROUTMAN v. JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS LLC (2019)
Partners, 268 Ga. App. 480, 483 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004) (quoting Greene v. Transport Ins.
quoting Greene v. Transport Ins. Co., 169 Ga.App. 504, 506 , 313 S.E.2d 761 (1984)
green
Clemons v. Delta Airlines, Inc. (2016)
Partners, 268 Ga. App. 480, 483 (2) ( 602 SE2d 140 ) (2004). 4 In his appellate brief, Clemons also argues the merits of his fraud claims and argues that his federal due process rights have been violated.
green
In re Residential Capital, LLC (2015)
Partners, 268 Ga.App. 480 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004) (“ 'It is the general rule that a judgment sought to be used as a basis for the application of the doctrine of res judicata (or collateral estoppel) must be a final judgment.
“ 'It is the general rule that a judgment sought to be used as a basis for the application of the doctrine of res judicata (or collateral estoppel
green
Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (2014)
Partners, 268 Ga.App. 480 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004).
green
Cornus Corp. v. Geac Enterprise Solutions, Inc. (2012)
See, e.g., Regions Financial Corp. v. Marsh USA, Inc., 310 SW3d 382 , 391 n 5 (Term Ct App 2009) (“There is nothing in the present case to indicate that [the federal interest] exception would apply here.”); CS-Lakeview at Gwinnett, Inc. v. Retail Development Partners, 268 Ga App 480, 484, 602 SE2d 140 , rev den, 2004 Ga LEXIS 1059 (2004) (“We fail to see how the rule at issue here — whether a judgment has preclusive effect pending appeal — could affect the integrity of these…
“We fail to see how the rule at issue here — whether a judgment has preclusive effect pending appeal — could affect the integrity of these federal court processes.”
green
Barnett v. Elite Properties of America, Inc. (2010)
Partners, 268 Ga.App. 480 , 602 S.E.2d 140, 142 (2004).