Guess v. State (1992)
green
· 27 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199320092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Davis v. State (2008)
However, we have held that testimony recounting admissions of guilt by a declarant to a third party are admissible at trial when “the declarant is present, testifies, and is subject to cross-examination.” Guess v. State, 262 Ga. 487, 488-489 (2) ( 422 SE2d 178 ) (1992).
green
Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n (2003)
OCGA § 24-9-83; Guess v. State, 262 Ga. 487, 488 ( 422 SE2d 178 ) (1992); Green v. State of Ga., 43 Ga. 368 (2) (1871) (the impeaching statement must be relevant).
green
Drane v. State (1995)
While this type of evidence is generally inadmissible, see Guess v. State, 262 Ga. 487, 488 ( 422 SE2d 178 ) (1992), it may, nevertheless, be admitted in exceptional circumstances under Chambers and Green when it is both reliable and necessary.
green
Grant v. State (1994)
While it is an old and sound rule which excludes as incompetent any hearsay testimony relating statements attributed to an out-of-court declarant to the effect that the declarant, and not the accused, was the perpetrator of a crime (see Lyon v. State, 22 Ga. 399 ), that long-standing rule does not apply to exclude evidence that the declarant is the perpetrator where “the declarant is present, testifies, and is subject to cross-examination.” Guess v. State, 262 Ga. 487, 489 (…
green
Gardner v. State (1993)
Compare Guess v. State, 262 Ga. 487 ( 422 SE2d 178 ) (1992) (where this court held that the above-stated rule is not applicable where the declarant is present, testifies, and is subject to cross-examination).