How cited: Granville Medical Center v. Tipton · Go Syfert

Granville Medical Center v. Tipton (2003)

green · 130 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 27 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200420152026
green In re: Rogers (2025)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
App. 484, 492 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 797 (2003).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C. · 3 citations in this opinion
Ctr. v. Tipton, 160 N.C.
green Washington v. Cline (2014)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
App. 484, 493 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 797 (2003), is helpful to our analysis.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ctr. v. Tipton, 586 S.E.2d 791, 798 (N.C.
green State v. Hinnant (2017)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 484, 488-89 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003); see also Phelps v. McCotter, 252 N.C. 66, 67 , 112 S.E.2d 736, 737 (1960) (noting “the well established [sic] principle that there is a presumption in favor of the regularity and validity of the proceedings in the lower court”).
green State v. Cobb (2017)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 484 , 488–89, 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003) (stating that “[w]here the record is silent on a particular point, we presume that the trial court acted correctly,” then holding this Court would not presume the trial court erred by applying an incorrect legal standard where the record was silent as to which standard the lower court applied).
green Monaghan v. Schilling (2009)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
That he did not know nor understand the consequences of a failure to timely respond to the complaint and summons.” Id. at 487 , 586 S.E.2d at 794 (brackets omitted).
brackets omitted
green Lawrence v. Sullivan (2008)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 484, 491 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 796 (2003) (citation omitted) (discussing default judgments pursuant to N.C.
citation omitted
green Belanger v. Warren (2007)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
App. 484, 489 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003).
green Carpenter v. Agee (2005)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Ctr. v. Tipton, 160 N.C.App. 484, 490-91 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 796 (2003); Fender v. Deaton, 130 N.C.App. 657, 663 , 503 S.E.2d 707, 710 (1998), disc. review denied, 350 N.C. 94 , 527 S.E.2d 666 (1999); Steffey v. Mazza Construction Group, 113 N.C.App. 538, 540-41 , 439 S.E.2d 241, 243 (1994), disc. review improvidently allowed, 339 N.C. 734 , 455 S.E.2d 155 (1995).
green In re: K.R. (2026)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 488 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003)).
green In re: A.N. (2026)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 488 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003)).
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 486 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 794 (2003) (quoting Peebles v. Moore, 48 N.C.
quoting Peebles v. Moore, 48 N.C. App. 497, 504-05 , 269 S.E.2d 694, 698 (1980), modified and aff'd, 302 N.C. 351 , 275 S.E.2d 833 (1981)
Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.
Ctr. v. Tipton, 160 N.C.
citations omitted
green Yves v. Tolentino (2023)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 491 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 796 (2003) (citations omitted)); see also Taylor v. Brinkman, 108 N.C.
citations omitted
green ALLEN v. ELWELL (2022)
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
App. 484, 493 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 797 (2003)).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
App. 484, 493-94 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 797-98 (2003); Fender v. Deaton, 130 N.C.
green STOLLARD v. GWYNN (2021)
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
App. 484, 493 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 797 (2003)).
green Patton v. Vogel (2019)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 491 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 796 (2003) (citations omitted).
citations omitted
Rule Authority · N.C. Bus. Ct.
Ctr. v. Tipton, 160 N.C.
upholding denial of a defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s motion for default, made on the basis that the defendant “did not know nor understand the consequences of a failure to timely respond to the complaint and summons”
green Osman v. Reese (2010)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 489 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003) (citations omitted). "[W]here plaintiff and defendant offered contradictory affidavits regarding service of process `it is the duty of the trial court to evaluate such evidence[.]'" Id. (citation omitted).
citations omitted
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 487 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 794 (2003).
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 494 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 798 (2003)).
green Carroll v. Perry (2008)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 489 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 795 (2003).
green In Re KN (2007)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
Ctr. v. Tipton, 160 N.C.App. 484, 493 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 797 (2003).
green Couch v. Bradley (2006)
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 494 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 798 (2003). *856 Defendant contends he requested specific findings of fact during the following colloquy: Defense counsel: Mr. Bradley is not responsible for the Consent Forbearance Agreement being sent to Mayland and Haywood Community College.
Rule Authority · N.C. Ct. App.
App. 484, 490-91 , 586 S.E.2d 791, 796 (2003) (emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted).
emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted