How cited: Daniels v. Department of Transportation · Go Syfert

Daniels v. Department of Transportation (1996)

green · 35 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199920122026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: cf. · 4 citations in this opinion
Cf. Daniels, 222 Ga. App. at 238 (1) (physical precedent only) (holding that plaintiff failed to present evidence admissible for consideration of GDOT’s negligence when plaintiffs expert relied upon guidelines adopted after relevant design plans were finalized).
1
Rule Authority · Ariz. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cf. Daniels v. Dep’t of Transp., 474 S.E.2d 26, 28 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996) (holding that the Georgia Tort Claims Act exempts a public entity from liability for failing to upgrade a highway to meet current design standards because permitting liability “would effectively eliminate the [Act’s] protection”). ¶22 Glazer argues that her family’s injuries arose not from any plan or design but from the State’s failure to monitor I-10 for cross-median accidents in compliance with its ope…
holding that the Georgia Tort Claims Act exempts a public entity from liability for failing to upgrade a highway to meet current design standards because permitting liability “would effectively eliminate the [Act’s] protection”
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Not only does this provision exempt DOT from liability for highway design deficiencies where the highway was initially designed in substantial compliance with existing design standards, it exempts DOT from liability “for its failure to upgrade a highway to meet current design standards.” Daniels, 222 Ga. App. at 239 (2).
2
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Cox, 246 Ga. App. at 223 ; Daniels v. Dept. of Transp., 222 Ga. App. 237, 238-239 ( 474 SE2d 26 ) (1996).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Cox, 246 Ga. App. at 223 ; Daniels v. Dept. of Transp., 222 Ga. App. 237, 238-239 ( 474 SE2d 26 ) (1996).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Cox, 246 Ga. App. at 223 ; Daniels v. Dept. of Transp., 222 Ga. App. 237, 238-239 ( 474 SE2d 26 ) (1996).
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Daniels v. Dept. of Transp., 222 Ga. App. 237, 238 (2) ( 474 SE2d 26 ) (1996).
green Glazer v. State (2014)
Cited (see also) · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see also
Finally, Daniels “is not binding in any other case” in Georgia, Mock v. Kroger Co., 267 Ga.App. 1 , 598 S.E.2d 789, 791 (2004), but is “physical precedent only since one judge concurred in the judgment,” Davis v. State, 244 Ga.App. 345 , 535 S.E.2d 528, 531 (2000); see also Daniels, 474 S.E.2d at 28 (McMurray, P.J., concurring in judgment).
McMurray, P.J., concurring in judgment