In Re NB (2009)
green
· 14 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
In re K.H. (2020)
App. 773, 779 , 688 S.E.2d 713, 717 (2009) (remanding a termination of parental rights case to the trial court for further findings of fact on the grounds that “[t]he trial court . . . [did] not make any findings of fact which directly address[ed] whether [the respondent] lacked an appropriate alternative childcare arrangement”); Watts v. Borg Warner Auto., Inc., 171 N.C.
remanding a termination of parental rights case to the trial court for further findings of fact on the grounds that “[t]he trial court . . . [did] not make any findings of fact which directly address[ed] whether [the respondent] lacked an appropriate alternative childcare arrangement”
green
In re L.H. (2011)
App. 773, 778-79 , 688 S.E.2d 713, 717 (2009), in which this court reversed a termination of parental rights based on dependency.
green
In Re LH (2011)
Respondent father also cites In re N.B., I.B., & A.F., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 688 S.E.2d 713, 717 (2009), in which this court reversed a termination of parental rights based on dependency.
green
In re D.W.C. (2010)
App. -, -, 688 S.E.2d 713, 717 (2009) (“We find that any alleged violation of N.C.
“We find that any alleged violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-601(a) (2007), with respect to the prior termination hearings, may not be used to challenge the [order terminating parental rights].”
green
In Re Dwc, Jac (2010)
In re N.B., ___ N.C.App. ___, ___, 688 S.E.2d 713, 717 (2009) ("We find that any alleged violation of N.C.
"We find that any alleged violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-601(a) (2007), with respect to the prior termination hearings, may not be used to challenge the [order terminating parental rights]."