How cited: Sinclair Disposal Service, Inc. v. Ochoa · Go Syfert

Sinclair Disposal Service, Inc. v. Ochoa (2004)

green · 11 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Sinclair Disposal Service v. Ochoa, 265 Ga. App. 172, 173 ( 593 SE2d 358 ) (2004) (“Compliance with the rules [of the road] does not necessarily demonstrate that a defendant exercised ordinary care”) (footnote omitted).
“Compliance with the rules [of the road] does not necessarily demonstrate that a defendant exercised ordinary care”
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
For all these reasons, we vacate the trial court’s order denying the City’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that there is a genuine issue of material fact on the question of whether the boom truck’s hazards lights were flashing at the were flashing at the time of the accident, “compliance with OCGA § 40-6-203 (c) does not insulate a waste disposal company from liability for negligence claims.” Sinclair Disposal Svc., Inc. v. Ochoa, 265 Ga. App. 172, 174 ( 593 SE2d …
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Compare Moody v. State, 210 Ga. App. 431, 433 (3) ( 436 SE2d 545 ) (1993) (expert testimony regarding test properly admitted where expert did not actually perform test, but “supervised the technician and conducted the interpretation, statistical analysis and measurements which generated the report”). 8 See John Crane, Inc. v. Jones, 262 Ga. App. 531, 535-536 (2) ( 586 SE2d 26 ) (2003) (trial court properly excluded expert testimony about the actual results of testing perform…