Hazelton v. State (1991)

green · 12 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 5

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Sarver v. State (1992)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

The accusation charged that Sarver “on the 18th day of April, 1991, in DeKalb County, State of Georgia, committed the offense of harassing phone calls by telephoning Brian Fuller for the purpose of harassing him in violation of OCGA § 16-11-39, the date alleged being a material element of this charge.” OCGA § 16-11-39 provides: “A person who commits any of the following acts commits a misdemeanor: ... (4) Telephones another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for…

green Williams v. State (2009)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Hazelton v. State, 200 Ga. App. 61, 63 ( 406 SE2d 569 ) (1991).

green State v. MacK (1998)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Moreover, under the former version of OCGA § 16-11-39 (4), which defines the offense, we held that “a person may commit the offense of ‘harassing phone calls’ in separate and alternative ways.” Hazelton v. State, 200 Ga. App. 61, 63 ( 406 SE2d 569 ) (1991).

green Todd v. State (1998)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Hazelton v. State, 200 Ga. App. 61, 63 ( 406 SE2d 569 ) (1991).

green Robbins v. State (1993)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Appellant first contends the record does not show whether the jury’s verdict was unanimous because the accusation alleged commission of the charged crime in two separate and alternative ways, see Hazelton v. State, 200 Ga. App. 61, 63 ( 406 SE2d 569 ) (1991), but the jury returned only a general verdict.