How cited: Grayson v. Yarbrough · Go Syfert

Grayson v. Yarbrough (1961)

green · 52 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196219942026
green Dowis v. McCurdy (1964)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Strickland v. Whatley, 142 Ga. 802 (1) ( 83 SE 856 ); Teague v. Keith, 214 Ga. 853 (6) ( 108 SE2d 489 ); Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 247 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).
green Hirsch v. Chapman (1964)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
However, it must be observed that our courts have continued to apply the doctrine, and to give approval to its application. *456 See Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 246 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).
green Kirby v. Larson (1977)
Rule Authority · Mich. · 2 citations in this opinion
As outlined in Smith v American Oil Co, 77 Ga App 463, 491; 49 SE2d 90, 108 (1948), disapproved on other grounds involving applicability of last clear chance to defendant, Grayson v Yarbrough, 103 Ga App 243, 246; 119 SE2d 41, 43-44 (1961), the Georgia doctrine is: "(1) if the negligence of the plaintiff equals or exceeds that of the defendant a recovery cannot be had by the plaintiff, (2) if the plaintiff is negligent in a lesser degree than the defendant a recovery may be …
green Slaughter v. Linder (1970)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 247 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).
green Jones v. Cloud (1969)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Accord: Strickland Motors Inc. v. State, 81 Ga. App. 824, 827 ( 60 SE2d 254 ); Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 246 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 246 ( 119 SE2d 41 ); Hirsch v. Chapman, 109 Ga. App. 444 , 452 et seq. ( 136 SE2d 409 ).
green Palmer v. Stevens (1967)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Grayson v. Yarborough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 247 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).” Stanley v. Squadrito, 107 Ga. App. 651, 655 ( 131 SE2d 227 ); Phillips v. Howard, 109 Ga. App. 404, 409 ( 136 SE2d 473 ).
green Hughes v. Brown (1965)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co. v. Grimes, 99 Ga. App. 774 (1) ( 109 SE2d 890 ); Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 245 (1) ( 119 SE2d 41 ); Georgia Sou. & F. R.
green Hughes v. Brown (1965)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Co. v. Grimes, 99 Ga. App. 774 (1) ( 109 SE2d 890 ); Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 245 (1) ( 119 SE2d 41 ); Georgia Sou. & F. R.
green Phillips v. Howard (1964)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 247 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).” The trolley, whether a “vehicle” by definition or not, is bound by this fundamental common law duty.
green Stanley v. Squadrito (1963)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Grayson v. Yarborough, 103 Ga. App. 243, 247 ( 119 SE2d 41 ).
Cited · S.D. Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Grayson v. Yarbrough, 103 Ga.App. 243 , 119 S.E.2d 41 .