How cited: Sweatman v. Roberts · Go Syfert

Sweatman v. Roberts (1957)

green · 22 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
195919922026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
This is plainly pronounced in Sweatman v. Roberts, 213 Ga. 112, 113 ( 97 SE2d 320 ), as follows: " 'Parties by consent express or implied, may not give jurisdiction to the court as to the person or subject-matter of the suit.
green Galvez v. Galvez (1996)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Sweatman v. Roberts, 213 Ga. 112, 113 ( 97 SE2d 320 ) (1957).
green Gray v. Gray (1972)
Rule Authority · Ga.
Smith v. Ferrario, 105 Ga. 51, 53 ( 31 SE 38 ); Langston v. Nash, 192 Ga. 427, 429 ( 15 SE2d 481 ); Ethridge v. Echols, 212 Ga. 597 (2) ( 94 SE2d 377 ); Sweatman v. Roberts, 213 Ga. 112, 113 ( 97 SE2d 320 ); Williams v. Kaylor, 218 Ga. 576, 581 ( 129 SE2d 791 ). 3.
green Williams v. Kaylor (1963)
Rule Authority · Ga.
Sweatman v. Roberts, 213 Ga. 112, 113 ( 97 SE2d 320 ); Kantzipper v. Kantzipper, 179 Ga. 850, 852 ( 177 SE 679 ); Smith v. Upshaw, 217 Ga. 703, 704 ( 124 SE2d 751 ).
green Barker v. Wilkinson (1966)
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Sweatman v. Roberts, 213 Ga. 112 ( 97 SE2d 320 ); Martin v. Bennett, 221 Ga. 482, supra. “If all the parties interested in the will are non-residents of the State of Georgia, the executor may file the bill in the county where the administration is pending, as our Code gives equity concurrent jurisdiction with the courts *332 of ordinary in the administration of estates and permits the executor to apply to equity for direction.