How cited: Burrell Ex Rel. Schatz v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. · Go Syfert

Burrell Ex Rel. Schatz v. O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (2005)

green · 17 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O'Reilly Auto., Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642, 652 (Mo. App. S.D. 2005) (citation omitted); see also State ex rel.
citation omitted
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Auto., Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642, 656 (Mo. App. S.D. 2005)). 9 At oral argument, Plaintiffs argued one prior incident is sufficient to put a possessor on notice for negligent acts of a third party, as opposed to the rule for criminal acts of a third party.
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Auto., Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642, 656 (Mo. App. S.D. 2005) (citing Stitt v. Raytown Sports Ass'n, Inc., 961 S.W.2d 927, 930 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998)).
citing Stitt v. Raytown Sports Ass'n, Inc., 961 S.W.2d 927, 930 (Mo. App. W.D. 1998)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Auto., Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642, 656 (Mo. App. S.D. 2005)). a.
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Auto., 175 S.W.3d 642, 656 (Mo. App.2005); Stitt v. Raytown Sports Ass’n, Inc., 961 S.W.2d 927, 930-31 (Mo.App. 1998); Bums v. Black & Veatch Architects, Inc., 854 S.W.2d 450, 457 (Mo.App. 1993); Wilson v. St.
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Automotive, 175 S.W.3d 642, 656 (Mo.App.2005)(quoting Stitt v. Raytown Sports Ass’n, Inc., 961 S.W.2d 927, 930 (Mo.App.1998)).
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642, 658 (Mo.App.2005).
green Caballero v. Stafford (2006)
Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.
Schatz v. O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642, 647 (Mo.App.
Cited (see also) · E.D. Mo. · signal: see also
See also Burrell v. O’Reilly Auto., Inc., 175 S.W.3d 642 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005) (evaluating contribution claim by assessing whether third-party defendant owed duty to plaintiff, not third-party plaintiff).
evaluating contribution claim by assessing whether third-party defendant owed duty to plaintiff, not third-party plaintiff