How cited: Prible v. State · Go Syfert

Prible v. State (2005)

green · 1,107 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 50
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199020082026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Prible v. Lumpkin (2022)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 730 (Tex. Crim.
green Cade, Tyrone (2015)
Quote Authority · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See id. at 732 (“Same-transaction contextual evidence results when an extraneous matter is so intertwined with the State’s proof of the charged crime that avoiding reference to it would make the State’s case incomplete or difficult to understand.”).
“Same-transaction contextual evidence results when an extraneous matter is so intertwined with the State’s proof of the charged crime that avoiding reference to it would make the State’s case incomplete or difficult to understand.”
green Quest Al'Javaughn Jones v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Quest Al'Javaughn Jones v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Don Doyle Gordon, Jr. v. the State of Texas (2022)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Joseph Valentino Joiner v. State (2020)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Todric McDonald v. State (2020)
Rule Authority · Tex. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Mark Anthony Briseno v. the State of Texas (2026)
Rule Authority · txctapp9
“In deciding whether photographs are 63 unfairly prejudicial, we must also consider the following factors: the number of photographs, the size, whether they are in color or black and white, whether they are gruesome, whether any bodies are clothed or naked, and whether a body has been altered by autopsy.” Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 734 (Tex. Crim.
green David Wayne Massar v. the State of Texas (2025)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Kenneth T. Smith v. the State of Texas (2025)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“Thus, a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of extraneous offenses is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Id. (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Madison McDonald v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green David Michael Thompson v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 734 (Tex. Crim.
green Arturo Lopez v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Chhoun Saing v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Tommy Earl Landrum, Jr. v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Jose Alexander Carrera v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See Carpenter v. State, No. 11-15-00323-CR, 2018 WL 3763773 at *4 (Tex. App.—Eastland Aug. 9, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (“The jury is entitled to know all of the ‘relevant surrounding facts and circumstances of the charged offense; an offense is not tried in a vacuum.’”) (quoting Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 732 (Tex. Crim.
green Jessica Briones v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
P. 44.2(b); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 737 (Tex. Crim.
applying Rule 44.2(b) to erroneous evidentiary ruling
green Antonio Jesus Flores v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2011) (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Carrendius Walker v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Joseph Michael Haley v. the State of Texas (2024)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
See id.; Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Jesus Angel Gomez-Gonzalez v. the State of Texas (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
citing Rogers v. State, 853 S.W.2d 29, 33 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)
green Pedro Acosta Jr. v. the State of Texas (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Adrian Robinson v. the State of Texas (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Additionally, “extraneous-offense evidence may . . . be admissible as same- transaction contextual evidence, where ‘several crimes are intermixed, or blended with one another, or connected so that they form an indivisible criminal transaction.’” Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
quoting Rogers v. State, 853 S.W.2d 29, 33 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)
green Dameon Tarrel Williams v. the State of Texas (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 734 (Tex. Crim.
green Gus Guevara v. the State of Texas (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
As to the extraneous crimes, wrongs, or acts discussed in the first hearing—the 1983 rape and 35Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green in Re City of Lubbock (2023)
Rule Authority · Tex. Crim. App.
App. 2004) (same); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 734 (Tex. Crim.
same
green Gregory Scott Hube v. the State of Texas (2022)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Joel Thomas Dies v. the State of Texas (2022)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“We review the trial court’s admission of extraneous offense evidence under an abuse of discretion standard.” Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Leonicio Alfredo Sharpe v. the State of Texas (2022)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“Thus, a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of extraneous offenses is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Jingbo Xu, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 3554 , at *9 (citing Devoe, 354 S.W.3d at 469 ; Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Marcus Gardner v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Ann. art. 37.07, § 3(g). 3 Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 732 (Tex. Crim.
green Sebastian Carlos Roman v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
STANDARD OF REVIEW “We review the trial court’s admission of extraneous offense evidence under an abuse of discretion standard.” Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Gerald Tomlinson v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Evid. 404(b)) (emphasis omitted); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Courtney Dobbins v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Erica Lane Brownlee v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“We examine several factors, including the photographs’ probative value, their potential to impress the jury in some irrational and indelible way, the time 11 needed to develop the evidence, and the proponent’s need for the photographs.” Id. (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 733 (Tex. Crim.
green Jingbo Xu v. the State of Texas (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“Thus, a trial court’s ruling on the 6 admissibility of extraneous offenses is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Id. (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Jose Morales v. State (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“We examine several factors, including the photographs’ probative value, their potential to impress the jury in some irrational and indelible way, the time needed to develop the evidence, and the proponent’s need for the photographs.” Gonzalez, 616 S.W.3d at 594 (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 733 (Tex. Crim.
green Roy Castaneda Rodriguez v. State (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Ty Lee Whitfield v. State (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
“Thus, a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of extraneous offenses is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Id. (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Amanda Shanae Willis v. State (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
There is no abuse of discretion so long as the trial court’s ruling is within the “zone of reasonable disagreement.” Devoe v. State, 354 S.W.3d 457, 469 (Tex.Crim.App. 2011)(quoting Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005)).
green Dustin Ray Sanders v. State (2021)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2011) (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Joseph Alexander Swansey v. State (2020)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2011) (citing Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green David Ray Baker v. State (2020)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2009); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Brian Woolard v. State (2020)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2009); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Jesse Galindo Delafuente v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Louis A. Murphy v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2009); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Da Ryan Tarrell Simms v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
However, Ruiz relied on Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Maycol Douglas Lagos-Valladares v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Evid. 404(b)) (emphasis omitted); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Anthony Williams v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Benjamin Williams v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2007); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.
green Daniel Oscar Gomez v. State (2019)
Rule Authority · Tex. App.
App. 2011); Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 731 (Tex. Crim.