Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co. (1953)
green
· 26 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196719962026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Outlaw v. Rye (2011)
See, e.g., Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953) (“equity may enforce liens created by express contracts under proper pleadings, and may protect equitable rights by impressing liens in the absence of a contract”); Country Greens Village One Owner’s Assn. v. Meyers, 158 Ga. App. 609, 611-612 (3) ( 281 SE2d 346 ) (1981) (“our Supreme Court has held that ‘a special lien on specific property may be decreed whenever under the rules of equity the …
“equity may enforce liens created by express contracts under proper pleadings, and may protect equitable rights by impressing liens in the absence of a contract”
green
MIDFIRST BANK v. STEPHANIE MANTOOTH (2025)
Georgia law permits such a lien to be imposed upon property “whenever the rules of equity require this remedy.” Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953). 12 But as discussed above, equity must operate “within the parameters of the law.” Dolinger, 269 Ga. at 143 (4).
“A ‘special lien’ on specific property may be decreed whenever the rules of equity require this remedy. [Cit.]” Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953).
green
Harris v. U. S. Development Corp. (1998)
Jones v. Jones, 264 Ga. 169 ( 441 SE2d 745 ) (1994); Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953).
green
Jones v. Jones (1994)
As in all equity actions, the jury may decree a special or equitable lien on specific property “whenever under the rules of equity the circumstances require this remedy.” Chapple v. Hight, 161 Ga. 629, 632 ( 131 SE 505 ) (1926); Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707-708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953); see First Nat.
green
DeKalb County v. J & a Pipeline Co. (1993)
(Emphasis omitted.) Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953).
green
Carolina Attractions, Inc. v. Courtney (1985)
Jur. (2d) Liens Section 22 (1970); Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706 , 75 S. E. (2d) 561, 562 (1953).
green
Country Greens Village One Owner's Ass'n v. Meyers (1981)
Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ); Cf. Shubert v. Spier, 201 Ga. 20 (3) ( 38 SE2d 835 ); see generally 53 CJS 840, Liens § 4(b); 51 AmJur2d 165, Liens §§ 25, 26.
green
Cross v. State (1969)
See in addition to the foregoing cases, and to the same effect, Smith v. Ga. Granite Corp., 186 Ga. 634, 639 ( 198 SE 772 , 119 ALR 550 ); Bagwell v. Cash, 207 Ga. 222 (4) ( 60 SE2d 628 ); Bouton v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ).
green
In the Matter of Darryl J. Ferguson (2026)
See also Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 (1953) (“A special or equitable lien is … simply a right of a special nature over the [property], which constitutes a 13 Although not relevant here, an equitable lien may also be available when a party was entitled to a statutory lien but was prevented from perfecting the lien.