How cited: Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co. · Go Syfert

Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co. (1953)

green · 26 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196719962026
green Outlaw v. Rye (2011)
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953) (“equity may enforce liens created by express contracts under proper pleadings, and may protect equitable rights by impressing liens in the absence of a contract”); Country Greens Village One Owner’s Assn. v. Meyers, 158 Ga. App. 609, 611-612 (3) ( 281 SE2d 346 ) (1981) (“our Supreme Court has held that ‘a special lien on specific property may be decreed whenever under the rules of equity the …
“equity may enforce liens created by express contracts under proper pleadings, and may protect equitable rights by impressing liens in the absence of a contract”
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Georgia law permits such a lien to be imposed upon property “whenever the rules of equity require this remedy.” Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953). 12 But as discussed above, equity must operate “within the parameters of the law.” Dolinger, 269 Ga. at 143 (4).
Rule Authority · Ga.
“A ‘special lien’ on specific property may be decreed whenever the rules of equity require this remedy. [Cit.]” Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953).
Rule Authority · Ga.
Jones v. Jones, 264 Ga. 169 ( 441 SE2d 745 ) (1994); Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953).
green Jones v. Jones (1994)
Rule Authority · Ga.
As in all equity actions, the jury may decree a special or equitable lien on specific property “whenever under the rules of equity the circumstances require this remedy.” Chapple v. Hight, 161 Ga. 629, 632 ( 131 SE 505 ) (1926); Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 707-708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953); see First Nat.
Rule Authority · Ga.
(Emphasis omitted.) Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ) (1953).
Rule Authority · S.C. Ct. App.
Jur. (2d) Liens Section 22 (1970); Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706 , 75 S. E. (2d) 561, 562 (1953).
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ); Cf. Shubert v. Spier, 201 Ga. 20 (3) ( 38 SE2d 835 ); see generally 53 CJS 840, Liens § 4(b); 51 AmJur2d 165, Liens §§ 25, 26.
green Cross v. State (1969)
Rule Authority · Ga.
See in addition to the foregoing cases, and to the same effect, Smith v. Ga. Granite Corp., 186 Ga. 634, 639 ( 198 SE 772 , 119 ALR 550 ); Bagwell v. Cash, 207 Ga. 222 (4) ( 60 SE2d 628 ); Bouton v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 ( 75 SE2d 561 ).
Cited (see also) · Ga. · signal: see also
See also Routon v. Woodbury Banking Co., 209 Ga. 706, 708 (1953) (“A special or equitable lien is … simply a right of a special nature over the [property], which constitutes a 13 Although not relevant here, an equitable lien may also be available when a party was entitled to a statutory lien but was prevented from perfecting the lien.