Noe v. State (2007)

green · 32 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 13

Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200820172026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Hubert v. State (2009)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

Noe, 287 Ga. App. at 730 (1); Harris, 279 Ga. App. at 571 (1); Atkins, 243 Ga. App. at 490-491 (2).

green SARRATT v. State (2009)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Ellington and Mikell, JJ., concur. 1 See Rogers v. State, 191 Ga. App. 855 (1) ( 383 SE2d 331 ) (1989). 2 See Tanner v. State, 259 Ga. App. 94 (1) ( 576 SE2d 71 ) (2003). 3 See Phillips v. State, 284 Ga. App. 683, 684 (1) (a) ( 644 SE2d 535 ) (2007). 4 See Frady v. State, 245 Ga. App. 832 (1) (a) ( 538 SE2d 893 ) (2000). 5 See Malone v. State, 277 Ga. App. 694, 696 (1) ( 627 SE2d 378 ) (2006); Carr v. State, 214 Ga. App. 367 (1) ( 448 SE2d 33 ) (1994). 6 See Foster v. State,…

green Scruggs v. State (2008)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 731 (2) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007).

green State v. Darrell Reed Shelnutt (2022)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

“Trial counsel articulated valid reasons for not calling [an expert] as a trial witness, and his strategy did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.” Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 731 (2) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007).

green Everhart v. the State (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Although credibility of a witness “is a matter solely within the province of a jury[,]” this court need not exclude testimony simply because a defendant argues the testimony is tangentially related to credibility Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007) (citation omitted).

green Powell v. the State (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

It is error for a trial court to permit a witness “to bolster the credibility of another witness by expressing an opinion that the witness is telling the truth.” Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007).

green Reinhard v. State (2015)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007); see also Odom v. State, 243 Ga. App. 227 (1) ( 531 SE2d 207 ) (2000) (“[T]here is absolutely nothing wrong with expert opinion testimony that bolsters the credibility of the indicted allegations of sexual abuse, e.g.,... the victim’s psychological evaluation was consistent with sexual abuse.”) (punctuation omitted).

green Andrew C. Reinhard v. State (2015)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

(Citations and punctuation omitted.) Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007); see also Odom v. State, 243 Ga. App. 227 (1) ( 531 SE2d 207 ) (2000) (“[T]here is absolutely nothing wrong with expert opinion testimony that bolster’s the credibility of the indicted allegations of sexual abuse, e.g., . . . the victim’s psychological evaluation was consistent with sexual abuse.”) (punctuation omitted).

green Cecil Ray Wright v. State (2014)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

“It is erroneous . . . for a witness, even an expert, to bolster the credibility of another witness by expressing an opinion that the witness is telling the truth.” Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007) (citation omitted).

green Wright v. State (2014)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

“It is erroneous ... for a witness, even an expert, to bolster the credibility of another witness by expressing an opinion that the witness is telling the truth.” Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007) (citation omitted).

green Cade v. State (2011)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Bethea v. State, 251 Ga. 328, 331 (10) ( 304 SE2d 713 ) (1983). “ ‘(T)he fact that such [expert] testimony may also indirectly, though necessarily, involve the [other witnesses’] credibility does not render it inadmissible.’ [Cits.]” Noe v. State, 287 Ga. App. 728, 730 (1) ( 652 SE2d 620 ) (2007).

green Downer v. State (2011)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Fox, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. 1 OCGA § 16-6-4 (a). 2 See Brookshire v. State, 288 Ga. App. 766 ( 655 SE2d 332 ) (2007). 3 Id. (citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979)). 4 Foster v. State, 286 Ga. App. 250, 252 (1) ( 649 SE2d 322 ) (2007). 5 (Punctuation omitted.) Shorter v. State, 271 Ga. App. 528, 528-529 ( 610 SE2d 162 ) (2005). 6 OCGA § 16-6-4 (a). 7 See Honeycutt v. State, 245 Ga. App. 819, 819-820 (1) ( 538 SE2d 870 )…

green Rouse v. State (2008)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Indeed, Rouse at the hearing on the motion for new trial conceded that “there is not anything in the record that indicates that the trial court [affirmatively] let in any evidence that was inappropriate.” 8 Lewis v. State, 279 Ga. 69, 73 (5), n. 17 ( 608 SE2d 602 ) (2005). 9 Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Daniel, 244 Ga. 284, 286 (1) ( 260 SE2d 20 ) (1979). 10 Campbell v. State, 248 Ga. App. 162, 166 (3) ( 545 SE2d 6 ) (2001). 11 Holmes v. State, 273 Ga. 644, 648 (5) (o) ( 543…