Fulton County v. State (2007)

green · 54 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 13

Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200720162026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green State v. Wheeler (2020)

Rule Authority · Ga. · 3 citations in this opinion

Like the different types of appeals discussed above, OCGA § 5- 7-1 (a) (5) “prescrib[es] the conditions under which the judgment of the court may be considered appealable.” Fulton County, 282 Ga. at 570 (citation and punctuation omitted).

citation and punctuation omitted

green Calvin Braddy v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

“The collateral order exception is to be applied if the order (1) resolves an issue that is ‘substantially separate’ from the basic issues to be decided at trial, (2) would result in the loss of an important right if review had to await final judgment, and (3) completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal such that nothing in the underlying action can affect it.” Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green Duke v. State (2019)

Rule Authority · Ga. · 2 citations in this opinion

“The jurisdiction of an appellate court to consider an appeal depends upon whether the appeal is taken in substantial compliance with the rules of appellate procedure prescribing the conditions under which the judgment of the trial 3 court may be considered appealable.” (Citation omitted.) Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 570 (1) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green Braddy v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green Britt v. State (2007)

Rule Authority · Ga. · 2 citations in this opinion

As this Court recently reiterated in Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 (1) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007), the collateral order exception is to be applied if the order being appealed (1) resolves an issue that is “substantially separate” from the basic issues to be decided at trial, (2) would result in the loss of an important right if review had to await final judgment, and (3) completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal such that nothing in the underlying actio…

green Girish Modi v. Greater Atlanta Telugu Association (2021)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

This doctrine permits the direct appeal of an otherwise interlocutory ruling where the order “(1) resolves an issue that is substantially separate from the basic issues to be decided at trial, (2) would result in the loss of an important right if review had to await final judgment, and (3) completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal such that nothing in the underlying action can affect it.” Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 (1) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green Lynn W. Martin v. Mary Tonya Fowler (2020)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

This doctrine applies when the order “completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal such that nothing in the underlying action can affect it.” Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 (1) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green State v. Rowe (2020)

Rule Authority · Ga.

State v. Murray, 286 Ga. 258, 259 (1) ( 687 SE2d 790 ) (2009) (holding that this Court had jurisdiction over a collateral order for contempt against the prosecutor in a murder case); Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 570-571 (1) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007) (addressing a collateral order directing Fulton County to pay part of the defense expenses); In re Paul, 270 Ga. 680, 682-683 ( 513 SE2d 219 ) (1999) (addressing a collateral order to compel a non-party to disclose informat…

green City of College Park v. Clayton County, Georgia (2020)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 (1) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green Rivera v. Washington (2016)

Rule Authority · Ga.

See, e.g., Warren v. State, 297 Ga. 810 ( 778 SE2d 749 ) (2015) (A pretrial order to involuntarily medicate a criminal defendant in an effort to render him competent to stand trial was directly *775 appealable.); Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007) (The doctrine was applicable to an order requiring Fulton County to pay expenses associated with the defense of a criminal defendant, which order was entered in the criminal prosecution.); In re Paul, …

green Warren v. State (2015)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Under that doctrine, an order that does not resolve the entire case in the trial court may be appealed immediately if it “(1) resolves an issue that is ‘substantially separate’ from the basic issues to be decided at trial, (2) would result in the loss of an important right if review had to await final judgment, and (3) completely and conclusively decides the issue on appeal such that nothing in the underlying action can affect it.” Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 571 ( …

green Georgia Public Defender Standards Council v. State (2009)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Under former OCGA § 17-12-44, which was enacted in 1979, a court was empowered to order a county to pay for legal services for an indigent defendant in a capital felony case. [Cits.] However, this Code section was only effective until January 1, 2005, following establishment of the Georgia Public Defender Standards Council. [Cits.] Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 572 (3) ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007).

green First Christ Holiness Church, Inc. v. Owens Temple First Christ Holiness Church, Inc. (2008)

Rule Authority · Ga.

Fulton County v. State, 282 Ga. 570, 570 ( 651 SE2d 679 ) (2007); Crane v. State, 281 Ga. 635, 635 ( 641 SE2d 795 ) (2007).