How cited: State v. Jackson · Go Syfert

State v. Jackson (1998)

green · 88 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199820122026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 5 citations in this opinion
S., 178 Ga. App. 380, 381 ( 343 SE2d 152 ) (1986). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) State of Ga. v. Jackson, supra at 310 (1). 9 N. Fulton Community Hosp. v. State Health Planning & Dev.
1
Rule Authority · Ga. · 4 citations in this opinion
Instead, we have construed the latest Supreme Court precedent such “that a facial attack on a statute will be upheld if the statute operates unconstitutionally in a large fraction of the cases in which it applies. [Cits.]” State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 311-312 (1) ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998).
green Marks v. State (2005)
Rule Authority · Ga. · 2 citations in this opinion
“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute has an adverse impact on that party’s own rights. [Cit.]” State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 310 (1) ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998).
Rule Authority · Ga.
Nevertheless, as the Board correctly notes, “stigmatization of reputation alone does not implicate a liberty interest sufficient to invoke federal due process protection.” State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 310 (1) ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998).
Rule Authority · Ga.
This Court “has allowed a facial challenge to a statute when it would unconstitutionally impact a fundamental right in ‘a large fraction’ of the cases to which the statute applies. [Cit.]” State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 311 (1) ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998).
Rule Authority · Ga.
See Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005); Agan v. State, 272 Ga. 540, 542 (1) ( 533 SE2d 60 ) (2000); State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 310 ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998); Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989).
Rule Authority · Ga.
“When an unconstitutional portion of a statute is so connected with the general scope of the statute that to sever it would result in a statute that fails to correspond to the main legislative purpose, or give effect to that purpose, the statute must fall in its entirety.” State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 312 (1) ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998).
Rule Authority · Mass. Super. Ct.
Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415 (1979); Lee TT. v. Dowling, 664 N.E.2d 1243, 1249-50 (N.Y. 1996); State v. Jackson, 496 S.E.2d 912, 915 (Ga. 1998); Cavaretta v. Dep’t of Children & Family Serv’s, 660 N.E.2d 250, 254 (Ill.App.Ct. 1996); N.J.
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 6 citations in this opinion
See id. at 311-312 , 496 S.E.2d 912 .
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Jackson, 269 Ga. at 312 .
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See id. at 308-309 , 496 S.E.2d 912 .
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ga. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
However, “for one part of a statute to be upheld as severable when another is stricken as unconstitutional, they must not be mutually dependent on one another.” Id.; see also State v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308 , 496 S.E.2d 912 (1998).
green Walton v. State (2000)
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See generally State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 310 ( 496 SE2d 912 ) (1998) (right of confrontation insures that witness will give statement under oath which is subject to cross-examination). 4.
green Turner v. State (1998)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Pope, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur. 1 OCGA § 16-6-2 (a). 2 Griffis v. State, 222 Ga. App. 322, 323 (1) ( 474 SE2d 119 ) (1996); Wimpey v. State, 180 Ga. App. 529, 530 (2) ( 349 SE2d 773 ) (1986). 3 Hutchison v. State, 218 Ga. App. 601, 602 ( 462 SE2d 648 ) (1995). 4 Glass v. State, 199 Ga. App. 530, 531-532 (1) ( 405 SE2d 522 ) (1991). 5 210 Ga. App. 634, 636 (2) (d) ( 437 SE2d 333 ) (1993). 6 Supra. 7 (Emphasis in original.) Id. at 323 (1); see Winter v. State, 171 Ga. App…
Cited · Ga. · signal: see
See id. at 308-309 .