How cited: Sardy v. Hodge · Go Syfert

Sardy v. Hodge (1994)

green · 10 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Folsom v. Rowell (2007)
Rule Authority · Ga.
However, [t]he will is construed according to the law in effect at the time of the testator’s death. [Cits.] The presumption is that the testator “intended that his property should go where the law carries it____” [Cit.] The statutory change in the law [34] years after the testator’s death relating to the inheritance rights of [remaindermen] ... will not be given retrospective effect. [Cit.] Sardy v. Hodge, 264 Ga. 548, 549-550 ( 448 SE2d 355 ) (1994).
green Tolbert v. Whatley (1996)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Sardy v. Hodge, 264 Ga. 548, 550 ( 448 SE2d 355 ) (1994).
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Sardy v. Hodge, 264 Ga. 548, 549-550 ( 448 SE2d 355 ) 7 (1994).6 We find, therefore, that Code 1933 § 85-704 governs the interests of any remaindermen under the Deed.
green Wilkes v. Fraser (2013)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Sardy v. Hodge, 264 Ga. 548, 549-550 ( 448 SE2d 355 ) (1994). 6 We find, therefore, that Code 1933 § 85-704 governs the interests of any remaindermen under the Deed.
green Warner v. Reynolds (2001)
Cited · Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Sardy v. Hodge, 264 Ga. 548, 549 ( 448 SE2d 355 ) (1994).