How cited: Futch v. State · Go Syfert

Futch v. State (1978)

green · 39 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197820022026
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion
Such a general request for information to all persons present in a residence (or its curtilage) does not bear the hallmarks of a “custodial interrogation” or questioning aimed at establishing a particular suspect’s guilt, but rather more closely resembles a “general on-the-scene investigation.” See Lucas, 265 Ga. App. at 244 (2); Wintker, 223 Ga. App. at 67 ; Futch, 145 Ga. App. at 486, 488-489 (3). (c) Finally, the investigator’s second question, in which he showed the blac…
3
green Phillips v. State (1987)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
State v. Brittain, 147 Ga. App. 626, 627 ( 249 SE2d 679 ); Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 486 (1), 487 ( 243 SE2d 621 ).
green Bailey v. State (1980)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 488 (3) ( 243 SE2d 621 ) (1978); Allen v. United States, 390 F2d 476 (D.
green Hardwick v. State (1979)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
"There being no exigent circumstances, the law enforcement officers were not authorized to search the trunk without a warrant even though probable cause for a search may have existed.” Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 486 ( 243 SE2d 621 ).
green Cummings v. State (2000)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 488-489 (3) ( 243 SE2d 621 ) (1978).
green Daugherty v. State (1987)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Such detentions do not trigger the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, supra. See Shy v. State, 234 Ga. 816, 820 (1) ( 218 SE2d 599 ).’ Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 488 (3) ( 243 SE2d 621 ).
green Humphrey v. State (1985)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Such detentions do not trigger the requirements of Miranda v. Arizona, supra. See Shy v. State, 234 Ga. 816, 820 (1) ( 218 SE2d 599 ).” Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 488 (3) ( 243 SE2d 621 ).
green Heard v. State (1984)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
See Newmans v. State, 65 Ga. App. 288, 291 ( 16 SE2d 87 ); Peters v. State, 72 Ga. App. 157, 160 (4) ( 33 SE2d 454 ); Borders v. State, 114 Ga. App. 90, 92 (4) ( 150 SE2d 306 ); Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 490 (7) ( 243 SE2d 621 ). 15.
green Suddeth v. State (1982)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Shy v. State, 234 Ga. 816, 819 ( 218 SE2d 599 ) (1975); Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 488 ( 243 SE2d 621 ) (1978).
green Melton v. State (1979)
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 487 (2) ( 243 SE2d 621 ).
green Boyd v. State (1983)
Cited (see also) · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: compare · 2 citations in this opinion
Compare, Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485 (2) ( 243 SE2d 621 ). 7.
green State v. Roberson (1983)
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Futch v. State, 145 Ga. App. 485, 488 (3) ( 243 SE2d 621 ) (1978). 2.