State v. Johns (1987)
green
· 330 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198720062026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Peregrina (2011)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 882 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1336 (1987).
green
State v. Clements (2009)
Idaho Code § 19 -2520E provides in pertinent part that “any person convicted of two (2) or more substantive crimes provided for in [I.C. § 19-2520], which crimes arose out of the same indivisible course of conduct, may only be subject to one (1) enhanced penalty.” “Th[e] statute, by its wording, limits the otherwise mandatory duty of the district court to enhance ‘multiple’ sentences under I.C. § 19-2520.” State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 882 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1336 (1987).
green
State v. Wright (2000)
If the police officer’s suspicions are “confirmed or further aroused, the stop may be prolonged and the scope of the investigative stop enlarged.” State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987).
green
State v. Wright (2000)
If the police officer’s suspicions are “confirmed or further aroused, the stop may be prolonged and the scope of the investigative stop enlarged.” State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987).
green
State v. Molen (2010)
State v. Elison, 135 Idaho 546, 552 , 21 P.3d 483, 489 (2001); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1335 (1987); State v. Olsen, 103 Idaho 278, 285 , 647 P.2d 734, 741 (1982); State v. Arrasmith, 132 Idaho 33, 43-44 , 966 P.2d 33, 43-44 (Ct.App.1998).
green
State v. Alsanea (2003)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1335 (1987).
green
State v. Page (2000)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987).
green
State v. DuValt (1998)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 876-77 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1330-31 (1987) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)).
green
State v. Howley (1996)
Eastman, 122 Idaho at 89-90 , 831 P.2d at 557-58 (“A defendant’s requested instruction need not be given if it was ... not supported by the facts of the case.”) Cf. State v. Fodge, 121 Idaho 192, 195 , 824 P.2d 123, 126 (1992) (interpreting I.C. § 19-2132(b) and holding that if there is a reasonable view of the evidence presented in the case to support a finding of a lesser offense an instruction should be given); see also State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, …
“[Rjefusal of defen *879 dant’s requested instructions allegedly dealing with his defense theory is not error where that proposed statement is ... not supported by the evidence_”
green
State of Idaho v. Thomas B. Rowley (2026)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 , (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987). 1.
green
State v. Campbell (2024)
Thus, “in determining whether the officer acted reasonably in such circumstances, due weight must be given, not to his inchoate and unparticularized suspicions or ‘hunch,’ but to specific reasonable inferences which he is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his experience.” DuValt, 131 Idaho at 554 , 961 P.2d at 645 (quoting State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987)).
green
State v. Maahs (2023)
To compare, the discovery of evidence within Maahs’s vehicle would have a causal or logical link to the manner of his detention if the evidence was obtained as a product or result of: (1) his involuntary consent to a search after he was “in custody” based on the “surrounding circumstances,” see State v. Hansen, 138 Idaho 791, 796 , 69 P.3d 1052, 1057 (2003); (2) his incriminating statements during a “custodial” interrogation, see United States v. Chamberlin, 644 F.2d 1262 (9…
addressing whether a detention amounted to a de facto arrest where the defendant sought to suppress his statements during the seizure
green
State v. Maahs (2023)
To compare, the discovery of evidence within Maahs’s vehicle would have a causal or logical link to the manner of his detention if the evidence was obtained as a product or result of: (1) his involuntary consent to a search after he was “in custody” based on the “surrounding circumstances,” see State v. Hansen, 138 Idaho 791, 796 , 69 P.3d 1052, 1057 (2003); (2) his incriminating statements during a “custodial” interrogation, see United States v. Chamberlin, 644 F.2d 1262 (9…
addressing whether a detention amounted to a de facto arrest where the defendant sought to suppress his statements during the seizure
green
State v. Maahs (2021)
State v. DuValt, 131 Idaho 550, 554 , 961 P.2d 641, 645 (1998) (concluding use of handcuffs to ensure officer safety was a reasonable precaution during an investigatory detention where occupants of vehicle were “far from cooperative” and the officers were “unaware exactly what activities” the occupants had been involved in); State v. Pannell, 127 Idaho 420, 424-25 , 901 P.2d 1321, 1325-26 (1995) (discussing compliance and number of suspects as relevant factor in determining …
green
Reagan v. Idaho Transportation Department (2021)
Handcuffing a suspect alone does not automatically convert an investigative detention into an arrest where “the use of handcuffs was a reasonable precaution for the officer’s safety.” State v. Pannell, 127 Idaho 420 , 423–24, 901 P.2d 1321 , 1324–25 (1995) (quoting State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987)).
green
State v. Kasey A. Smith (2017)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
State v. Kasey A. Smith (2017)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
Tarango Deforest Padilla v. State (2016)
The standard of proof which a state must satisfy in order to justify an investigatory stop is to be judged by a “totality of the circumstances.” State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987).
green
State v. Robert Dean Hall (2016)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987).
green
State v. Gunnar Liam Breymann (2016)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
State v. Keith A. Brown (2016)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 619, 626-27 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618, 627 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
State v. Lisa Marie Boat (2015)
State v. Eby, 136 Idaho 534, 539 , 37 P.3d 625, 630 (Ct. App. 2001) (citing State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987); State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct. App. 1992)).
green
Christopher Conley Tapp v. State (2013)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
State v. Tesha Jowane Sunday (2013)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987) (citations omitted). 1.
citations omitted
green
State v. Keith Allan Brown (2013)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
State v. Keith Allan Brown (2013)
Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 489 , 92 S.Ct. 619, 626-27 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618, 627-28 (1972); State v. Yager, 139 Idaho 680, 685 , 85 P.3d 656, 661 (2004); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987).
green
State v. McGiboney (2012)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 882 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1336 (1987).
green
State v. Jacobson (2010)
See State v. Payne, 146 Idaho 548, 562 , 199 P.3d 123, 137 (2008) (whether an out-of-court identification violated due process turns on the totality of the circumstances); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 879 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1333 (1987) (applying the totality of the circumstances to evaluate whether a confession was voluntary or violated due process); State v. Carr, 128 Idaho 181, 184 , 911 P.2d 774, 777 (CtApp. 1995) (“due process is flexible and calls for such procedural pr…
green
State v. Cain D. Peery (2010)
United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 (1981); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987).
green
State v. Steven S. Leas (2010)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1335 (1987); State v. Olsen, 103 Idaho 278, 285 , 647 P.2d 734, 741 (1982); State v. Arrasmith, 132 Idaho 33, 43-44 , 966 P.2d 33, 43-44 (Ct. App. 1998).
green
State v. Sandra Perez Cantu (2010)
State v. Elison, 135 Idaho 546, 552 , 21 P.3d 483, 489 (2001); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1335 (1987); State v. Olsen, 103 Idaho 278, 285 , 647 P.2d 734, 741 (1982); State v. Arrasmith, 132 Idaho 33, 43-44 , 966 P.2d 33, 43-44 (Ct. App. 1998).
green
State v. Diego Morales Peregrina (2010)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 882 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1336 (1987).
green
State v. Zuniga (2006)
United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987).
green
State v. Yager (2004)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 878 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1332 (1987), citing Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972).
green
State v. Tadlock (2001)
State v. Howley, 128 Idaho 874, 878-79 , 920 P.2d 391, 395-96 (1996); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987); State v. Arrasmith, 132 Idaho 33, 43 , 966 P.2d 33, 43 (Ct.App.1998).
green
State v. Varie (2001)
State v. Dambrell, 120 Idaho 532, 541 , 817 P.2d 646, 655 (1991), citing State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987).
green
State v. Custodio (2001)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 882 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1336 (1987).
green
State v. Eby (2001)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987); State v. Kodesh, 122 Idaho 756, 758 , 838 P.2d 885, 887 (Ct.App.1992).
green
State v. Ferreira (1999)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987) (Under Terry and Idaho law, limited stops can be made for investigative purposes.).
Under Terry and Idaho law, limited stops can be made for investigative purposes.
green
State v. Pabillore (1999)
United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981); DuValt, supra; State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331 (1987).
green
State v. Frank (1999)
Id., citing Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 500 , 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1325 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229, 238 (1983). [B]ased upon the specific facts of the situation and the reasonable inferences drawn from those facts, officers are entitled to use handcuffs in limited investigatory stops to maintain their safety. [State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 877-78 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1331-32 (1987) ].
green
State v. Arrasmith (1998)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987).
green
State v. Brown (1998)
State v. Dambrell, 120 Idaho 532, 540 , 817 P.2d 646, 654 (1991); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987).
green
State v. Welker (1997)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 879 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1333 (1987); Aitken, supra. For a defendant’s statement to be involuntary, the defendant’s will has to have been overcome by police conduct at the time he confessed.
green
Crooks v. Inland 465 Limited Partnership (1996)
It must be determined whether the work refused by a claimant is “suitable work” and, if so whether the claimant had “good cause” to refuse to accept such work. 112 Idaho at 873, 736 P.2d at 1327 .
green
State v. Waldie (1995)
Terry, 392 U.S. at 22 , 88 S.Ct. at 1880 ; Rawlings, 121 Idaho at 932 , 829 P.2d at 522 (1992); State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 876 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1330 (1987).
green
State v. Gomez (1994)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1335 (1987); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383, 385 , 807 P.2d 62, 64 (Ct.App.1991).
green
State v. Fetterly (1994)
State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 881 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1335 (1987); State v. Evans, 119 Idaho 383, 385 , 807 P.2d 62, 64 (Ct.App.1991).
green
State v. Patterson (1994)
Although it is error for the court to refuse requested instructions on points of law that are not otherwise covered and are pertinent to a defense theory, instructions are unnecessary and need not be given where the subject they address is adequately covered by other instructions given to. the jury. 3 State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987); State v. Olsen, 103 Idaho 278, 285 , 647 P.2d 734, 741 (1982).
green
State v. Kodesh (1992)
Citing State v. Johns, 112 Idaho 873, 880-81 , 736 P.2d 1327, 1334-35 (1987), defense counsel argued that she was nevertheless entitled to have this instruction given to the jury because it was a correct statement of the law, was supported by the evidence and did not constitute an impermissible comment on the evidence.