How cited: State v. Pina · Go Syfert

State v. Pina (1977)

green · 10 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · N.M.
“Broad standards are permissible so long as they are capable of reasonable application and are sufficient to limit and define the agency’s discretionary powers.” State v. Pina, 90 N.M. 181, 186 , 561 P.2d 43, 48 (Ct.App.1977); see also City of Santa Fe v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 73 N.M. 410, 417 , 389 P.2d 13, 18 (1964).
green State v. Johnson (1986)
Cited · N.M. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Pina, 90 N.M. 181 , 561 P.2d 43 (Ct.App. 1977); Crim.P.R. 7(c).
green State v. Libero (1978)
Cited · N.M. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Pina, 90 N.M. 181 , 561 P.2d 43 (Ct.App.1977).
green State v. Botello (2010)
Cited · N.M. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Pina, 90 10 N.M. 181 , 187, 561 P.2d 43, 49 (Ct. App. 1977) (holding that a defendant must show 11 prejudice to successfully challenge a variance of date).
holding that a defendant must show 11 prejudice to successfully challenge a variance of date