Mallon v. Employment Division (1979)

green · 66 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 4

Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198020032026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Roseburg Forest Products v. Langley (1998)

Quote Authority · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Mallon v. Employment Division, 41 Or App 479, 483 , 599 P2d 1164 (1979) (“Although the testimony of a witness before a legislative committee should be cautiously used in determining legislative intent, it is some indication of the legislation’s purpose.”).

“Although the testimony of a witness before a legislative committee should be cautiously used in determining legislative intent, it is some indication of the legislation’s purpose.”

green Doctor v. Employment Division (1985)

Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App.

Div., 41 Or App 479, 483, 599 P2d 1164 (1979), where we stated that “we should eschew narrow interpretations which would disqualify otherwise eligible unemployed persons.” (Emphasis supplied.) Furthermore, even when looking at the statutes together, there is no necessary conflict.

green Miller v. EMPLOYMENT DIV. & U. GOSPEL MISSION (1980)

Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App.

App. at 484 , 599 P.2d at 1166, 1167 .

green State v. Lyon (1987)

Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see

See State v. Skelton, 41 Or App 479 , 599 P2d 1171 (1979) (stipulation invalid because not signed by prosecutor.) Right number “4”: “I have a right to a court-appointed attorney to be paid from public funds if I am without funds;” was crossed out, and the notation “Not charged with crime,” was added.

stipulation invalid because not signed by prosecutor.