Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2009)
green
· 25 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 573 F.3d 916, 929 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 538 F.3d 1172, 1219 (9th Cir.2008)).
Citizen v. NRC, 573 F.3d 916, 918 (9th Cir.2009) (noting the “broad responsibility” reposed in the NRC, “free of close prescription in its charter as to how it shall proceed in achieving the statutory objectives” (quoting Siegel v. AEC, 400 F.2d 778 , 783 (D.C.Cir.1968))).
Comm’n, 573 F.3d 916, 923 (9th Cir. 2009).
Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 573 F.3d 916, 928 (9th Cir. 2009) (an agency “ 'may act not only on the basis of the comments received in response to its notice of rule making, but also upon the basis of information available in its own files, and upon the knowledge and expertise of the agency’ ” (quoting Siegel v. Atomic Energy Comm’n, 400 F.2d 778 , 786 (D.C.
green
Oceana, Inc. v. Bryson (2013)
Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 573 F.3d 916, 929 (9th Cir.2009) (“Because Petitioners have identified no effect of the revised DBT rule that may cause significant degradation of some human environmental factor, no EIS was necessary” where petitioners implicitly agreed “that the rule was otherwise only beneficial to the environment”).
green
Tam v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2011)
See also Alaska v. Federal Subsistence Board, 544 F.3d 1089, 1094 (9th Cir.2008) (“While we may not fabricate a rational basis for an agency’s action, we will ‘uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the agency’s path may reasonably be discerned,’ ” quoting Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, 463 U.S. at 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 ). “ ‘Nevertheless, the agency must examine the relevant data and articulate a satisfactory explanation for its action including a rational …
green
Henry v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2010)
See also Alaska v. Federal Subsistence Board, 544 F.3d 1089, 1094 (9th Cir.2008) (“While we may not fabricate a rational basis for an agency’s action, we will ‘uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the agency’s path may reasonably be discerned,’ ” quoting Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, 463 U.S. at 43 ). “ ‘Nevertheless, the agency must examine the relevant data and articulate a satisfactory explanation for its action including a rational connection betwee…