State v. McKeown (1991)
green
· 161 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Hill (2006)
State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 508, 515 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991).
green
State v. Marx (2009)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 510 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991) (vehicle stop on public roadway always a seizure).
vehicle stop on public roadway always a seizure
green
State v. Thompson (2007)
Consequently, an officer must "`have a reasonable and articulable suspicion, based on fact, that the person stopped has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime.' [Citation omitted.]" State v. DeMarco, 263 Kan. 727, 734 , 952 P.2d 1276 (1998); see also State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 510 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991) (traffic stop always constitutes a seizure and, therefore, officer must have articulable facts sufficient to constitute reasonable suspicion under K.S.A.…
traffic stop always constitutes a seizure and, therefore, officer must have articulable facts sufficient to constitute reasonable suspicion under K.S.A. 22-2402 and Terry
green
State v. Johnson (1993)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 508-09 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991).
green
State v. Pollman (2008)
Ed. 2d 247 , 104 S. Ct. 1758 (1984); see also State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 509 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991) (officer may “ask the individual’s name and request identification but cannot force the individual to answer”; individual is free to leave).
officer may “ask the individual’s name and request identification but cannot force the individual to answer”; individual is free to leave
green
State v. Vanek (2008)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 510 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991).
green
City of Norton v. Wonderly (2007)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 509-10 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991).
green
Miller v. Heaven (1996)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. 506, 509 , 819 P.2d 644 (1991) ("An officer who does not have reasonable suspicion to justify a Terry stop may, however, approach an individual on the street for investigative purposes.
"An officer who does not have reasonable suspicion to justify a Terry stop may, however, approach an individual on the street for investigative purposes. (Citations omitted
green
State v. Reno (1996)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. at 510 .” However, in the present case, Officer Benard had reason to suspect that Reno was violating Chanute Municipal Code § 5.16.130 in that he had in his possession an open container of alcoholic liquor.
green
State v. MacDonald (1993)
See State v. McKeown, 249 Kan. *321 506, 508-09, 819 P.2d 644 [1991].) The date of the trial court’s ruling was May 1, 1992.