How cited: Hamdan v. Gates · Go Syfert

Hamdan v. Gates (2008)

green · 22 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200820172026
green Al Odah v. Bush (2009)
Quote Authority · D.D.C. · signal: see · 5 citations in this opinion
See Hamdan, 565 F.Supp.2d at 136 (“Councilman involved court-martial proceedings against a U.S. service member, to be sure, and not a military commission, but its central rationale is applicable here”).
“Councilman involved court-martial proceedings against a U.S. service member, to be sure, and not a military commission, but its central rationale is applicable here”
green Al Odah v. USA (2009)
Rule Authority · D.D.C. · 4 citations in this opinion
LEXIS 95473 at *4 (entering stay after charges had been referred to a commission); Hamdan, 565 F. Supp. 2d at 133 (denying motion for injunction after charges had been referred to a commission).
denying motion for injunction after charges had been referred to a commission
green English v. Trump (2018)
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
See, e.g., Winter, 555 U.S. at 23 ; Hamdan v. Gates, 565 F. Supp. 2d 130, 137 (D.D.C. 2008); Bradshaw v. Veneman, 338 F. Supp. 2d 139, 144 (D.D.C. 2004).
Rule Authority · M.C.
Hamdan v. Gates, 565 F.Supp.2d 130, 136-37 (D.D.C. 2008).
green Khadr v. Bush (2008)
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
The system established by the MCA is worthy of such respect because it provides that petitioner “is to face a military commission ... designed ... by a Congress that ... acted according to guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court.” Hamdan v. Gates, 565 F.Supp.2d 130, 136 (D.D.C.2008) (quoting Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 464 F.Supp.2d 9, 18 (D.D.C.2006)).
green Khadr v. Bush (2010)
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Hamdam v. Gates (Hamdan II), 565 F. Supp. 2d 130, 137 (D.D.C. 2008) (military commission can evaluate a petitioner's challenges to charged offenses and evidence); see also Al Odah, 593 F. Supp. 2d at 59 ("The Court's proceedings may also produce rulings on the production of discovery and/or exculpatory information that diverge from those of the military commissions.").
military commission can evaluate a petitioner's challenges to charged offenses and evidence
green Khadr v. Obama (2010)
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Hamdan v. Gates (Hamdan II), 565 F.Supp.2d 130, 137 (D.D.C.2008) (military commission can evaluate a petitioner’s challenges to charged offenses and evidence); see also Al-Odah, 593 F.Supp.2d at 59 (“The Court’s proceedings may also produce rulings on the production of discovery and/or exculpatory information that diverge from those of the military commissions.”).