How cited: Frat. Or. of Pol. v. Com., Pa. Labor Rel. Bd. · Go Syfert

Frat. Or. of Pol. v. Com., Pa. Labor Rel. Bd. (1983)

green · 28 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
green Commonwealth v. Doa (1989)
Rule Authority · Pa.
See Floyd, 508 Pa. at 393, 399-405 (Nix, C J., concurring) and 405-408, 498 A.2d 816 at 819-822 and 823-824 (Larsen, J., concurring); Commonwealth v. Gee, 467 Pa. at 136, n. 5 , 354 A.2d at 880 n. 5 (Eagan, J., plurality opinion) and 467 Pa. 123, 143-146 , 354 A.2d 875, 884-886 (Roberts, J., dissenting) (”[W]e should admit the prior inconsistent statements of witnesses as evidence concerning the matters contained in the statement."); Commonwealth v. Thirkield, 502 Pa. 542, 5
McDermott, J., dissenting
green Commonwealth v. Black (1987)
Cited · Pa. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Fraternal Order of Police v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd., 71 Pa.Commw. 316, 454 A.2d 686 (1983), aff'd, 502 Pa. 541 , 467 A.2d 323 (1983).
green Commonwealth v. Brady (1986)
Cited · Pa. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Commonwealth v. Thirkield, supra at 502 Pa. 542 , 467 A.2d 323 (McDermott, J. dissenting: “the fact that [the oath and cross-examination requirements] are supplied in the current trial defuses hearsay concerns and provides the fact-finder with ample opportunity to determine truth.”).
green Com. v. Oum, K. (2015)
Cited · Pa. Super. Ct. · signal: see
See Common wealth v. Thil'kield, supra at 502 Pa. 542 , 467 A,2d 323 (McDennott, 1. dissenting: 'the fact that [the oath and Cross- examination requirement] are supp lied in u\e current trial defuses hearsay concerns and provides the ract-finder with ample opportunity to determine truth.').
green Commonwealth v. Jones (1994)
Cited · Pa. Super. Ct. · signal: see
See Commonwealth v. Thirkield, supra at 502 Pa. 542 , 467 A.2d 323 [ (1983) ] (McDermott, J. dissenting: “the fact that [the oath and cross-examination requirements] are supplied in the current trial defuses hearsay concerns and provides the fact-finder with ample opportunity to determine truth.”).