How cited: Pioneer Import Corporation v. the Lafcomo · Go Syfert

Pioneer Import Corporation v. the Lafcomo (1943)

green · 39 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
194619862026
Quote Authority · 3rd Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See Man Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Akili , 704 F.3d 77 , 83 (2d Cir. 2012) ; see also Pioneer Import Corp. v. Lafcomo , 49 F.Supp. 559 , 561-62 (S.D.N.Y. 1943), aff'd , 138 F.2d 907 (2d Cir. 1943) ("A lien against the ship arises for damage to cargo caused by improper storage.").
"A lien against the ship arises for damage to cargo caused by improper storage."
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Demsey, 461 F.2d at 1014; Pioneer Import, 138 F.2d at 908 ("[T]he maritime lien against the ship ... obtains whether or not [the ship] was under charter.”).
"[T]he maritime lien against the ship ... obtains whether or not [the ship] was under charter.”
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
The Thomas P. Beal, 3 Cir., 1926, 11 F.2d 49 and Pioneer Import Corp. v. The Lafcomo, 2 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 907 , apply the unseaworthy doctrine to improper stowage so far as a shipper’s right to damages for injury to the cargo is concerned.
Rule Authority
Sabine Howaldt, 437 F.2d 580 , 588 (2d Cir. 1970); Lekas & Drivas, Inc. v. Goulandris, 306 F.2d 426, 431-32 (2d Cir. 1962); Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Lloyd Brasileiro, 159 F.2d 661, 665 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 836 , 67 S.Ct. 1519 , 91 L.Ed. 1849 (1947); Armco Int’l Corp. v. Rederi A/B Disa, 151 F.2d 5, 8 (2d Cir. 1945); Edmond Weil, Inc. v. American West African Line, Inc., 147 F.2d 363, 366-67 (2d Cir. 1945); Pioneer Import Corp. v. The Lafcomo, 138 F.2d…
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Pioneer Import Corp. v. The Lafcomo, 138 F.2d 907, 908 (2d Cir. 1943), cert. denied, Black Diamond Lines, Inc. v. Pioneer Import Corp., 321 U.S. 766 , 64 S.Ct. 523 , 88 L.Ed. 1063 (1944); Blanchard Lumber Co. v. S.S.
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Morrison, 153 U.S. 199, 211 , 14 S.Ct. 823 , 38 L.Ed. 688 (1894); Pioneer Import Corporation v. The Lafcomo, 49 F.Supp. 559, 563 (S.D.N.Y.1943), aff’d 138 F.2d 907, 908 (2d Cir. 1944), cert. denied Black Diamond Lines v. Pioneer Import Corp., 321 U.S. 766 , 64 S.Ct. 523 , 88 L.Ed. 1063 ; Schroeder Bros.