Nelson v. Regan (1983)
green
· 97 citation events
across 24 courts.
Showing the 23 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Anderson v. White (1989)
See Wagner v. Duffy, 700 F.Supp. at 945 ; Marcello v. Regan, 574 F.Supp. at 598-99 ; Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. at 1108-09, 1111 .
green
Anderson v. White (1989)
See Wagner v. Duffy, 700 F.Supp. at 945 ; Marcello v. Regan, 574 F.Supp. at 598-99 ; Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. at 1108-09, 1111 .
green
Diotte v. Blum (1984)
See, e.g., Deary v. Guardian Loan Co., 534 F.Supp. 1178, 1183 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (accepting plaintiffs’ contention that “En-dicott-Johnson should no longer be followed because it reflects a different era of due process jurisprudence which has been largely eclipsed by more recent due process decisions”); see also Finberg v. Sullivan, 634 F.2d 50 , 56-57 (3d Cir.1980) (en banc); Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1107 (D.Conn.1983), aff'd, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1984). 12 The decis…
green
Brown v. Eichler (1987)
Id. at 1109.
green
Coughlin v. Regan (1984)
Accord Marcello v. Regan, 574 F.Supp. 586, 593-94 (D.R.I. 1983); Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1106 (D.Conn.1983), aff'd, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir., 1984); Sorenson v. Secretary of the Treasury, 557 F.Supp. 729, 733 (W.D.
green
McClelland v. Massinga (1984)
Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1107 (D.Conn.1983), Marcello v. Regan, 574 F.Supp. 586, 598-600 (D.R.I.1983), Coughlin , at 710-11. *566 Given the factual nature of the disputes which could arise concerning these arrearages, however, it would be very difficult for the state to anticipate all possible defenses and list them.
green
Butler v. Wing (1998)
As was observed by the court in Nelson v Regan ( 560 F Supp 1101, 1108 [D Conn 1983], affd 731 F2d 105): “The private interest here is obvious.
green
Laubinger v. Department of Revenue (1996)
Id. at 417. 11 Other tax intercept cases indicating that due process requires notice to the nonobligor spouse prior to seizure of tax refunds are Nelson v. Regan, 560 F. Supp. 1101, 1106-1109, 1111 (D.
Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1109 (D.Conn.1983), aff'd on other grounds, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.) cert. denied sub nom.
green
Alston v. Coughlin (1986)
While it is clear that a plaintiff need not prove the necessity of class certification, see Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1105 (D.Conn.1983), aff'd, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 175 , 83 L.Ed.2d 110 (1984); Montes v. Brezenoff 85 F.R.D. 130, 132 (S.D.N.Y.1980), where he relies on Rule 23(b)(2) to support a motion for class certification he must not only meet the requirements of the rule “but must also present additional reasons for obtai…
green
Smith v. Onondaga County Support Collection Unit (1985)
See also Coughlin v. Regan, 584 F.Supp. 697, 707 (D.Maine 1984); Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1106 (D.Conn.1983), affd on other grounds, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom.
green
Nelson v. Regan (1984)
See Rev.Rul. 74-611, 1974- 2 C.B. 399 and Rev.Rul. 80-7, 1980- 1 C.B. 296 . 4 On January 14, 1983, the district court, Ellen Bree Burns, Judge, issued a ruling reported as Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101 (D.Conn.1983).
green
Nelson v. Regan (1984)
See id. at 1104 & n. 2. 3 The federal defendants next argue that the district court lacked jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief because 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1976), which authorizes declaratory relief, precludes such relief “with. respect to Federal taxes.” See, e.g., Jolles Foundation, Inc. v. Moysey, 250 F.2d 166, 169 (2d Cir.1957).
green
Presley v. Regan (1985)
Maine 1984); accord, Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1106 (D.Conn.1983), aff 'd on other grounds, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
green
Jahn v. Regan (1984)
See Bob Jones University v. Simon, supra. As stated in Nelson v. Regan, supra, 560 F.Supp. at 1103 : [T]he federal-state intercept program takes effect only after the assessment and collection of federal income taxes.
green
Marcello v. Regan (1983)
See Nelson II, 560 F.Supp. at 1106 n. 6. 12 .
green
Trevino v. United States (2021)
Indeed, the Fifth Circuit has written that it is “well settled that a declaratory judgment cannot be issued in a tax case.” Horne v. United States, 519 F.2d 51, 52 (5th Cir.1975) (finding that a taxpayer’s request that an assessment of tax deficiency be declared void was impermissible under the DJA); see also Nelson v. Regan, 560 F. Supp. 1101, 1103 (D.
green
Doe v. United States (2016)
See Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101 , 1104 n. 2 (D.Conn.1983) (citing Briggs with approval for the principle that sovereign immunity does not bar declaratory injunctive relief where the plaintiff makes only a mild request that “does not interfere with the necessary functioning of the government”).
green
Greenhouse v. United States (1991)
See also, Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1103 (D.C.Conn.1983), aff'd, 731 F.2d 105 (2nd Cir.1984), cert. denied, sub nom.
green
Wagner v. Duffy (1988)
See, Brown v. Eichler, supra, Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101 (D.Conn.1983), affd., 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom.
green
Tucker v. Northeast Savings, F.A. (1987)
See Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101 (D.Conn.1983), aff’d, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 853 , 105 S.Ct. 175 , 83 L.Ed.2d 110 (1984); Wright v. Taneszio, Civil No. N-81-353 (D.Conn.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
green
Knisley v. Bowman (1987)
See, e.g., Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101 (D.Conn.1983), aff'd, 731 F.2d 105 (2d Cir.1984), ce rt. den., 469 U.S. 853 , 105 S.Ct. 175 , 83 L.Ed.2d 110 (1985).
green
Rucker v. Secretary of Treasury of United States (1986)
See, e.g., Nelson v. Regan, 560 F.Supp. 1101, 1108 (D.Conn.1983); Sorenson v. Secretary of the Treasury, 557 F.Supp. 729, 738 , (W.D.Wash.1982), aff'd, 752 F.2d 1433 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 3475 , 87 L.Ed.2d 611 (1985).