Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co. (1942)
green
· 22 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
194219842026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. (1951)
There is nothing to indicate that with the full cooperation of the defendant, who allegedly is seeking an early trial, the trial in this jurisdiction may not be had expeditiously and some slight delay would seem too slim a basis for departure from recognized principles.' 2 Dwinell-wright Co. v. National Fruit Products Co., 1 Cir., 1942, 129 F.2d 848, 852, 853 , Carbide & Carbon C.
green
Marshak v. Treadwell (2001)
Co., 129 F.2d 848, 853 (1st Cir. 1942); White House Milk Prods.
green
Larry Marshak v. Faye Treadwell Treadwell Drifters, Inc the Drifters, Inc. Bowen Agency Ltd/admiral Talent (2001)
Co., 129 F.2d 848, 853 (1st Cir.1942); White House Milk Prods.
See, also, Dwinell-Wright Co. v. National Fruit Product Co., 1 Cir., 1942, 129 F.2d 848 ; Judson Dunaway Corporation v. Hygienic Products Co., 1 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 461 , certiorari denied 339 U.S. 948 , 70 S.Ct. 802 , 94 L.Ed. 1362 ; Nancy Ann Storybook Dolls v. Dollcraft Co., 9 Cir., 1952, 197 F.2d 293, 295-296 ; Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., 2 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 331, 335 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 994 , 73 S.Ct. 1133 , 97 L.Ed. 1401 .
green
MAZCON, A KURTZ BROS. COMPANY LLC v. BEG GROUP LLC (2019)
See also Dwindle-Wright Co. v. Nat’l Fruit Product Co., 129 F.2d 848 (1* Cir. Jul. 16, 1942); 5 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 30:109 (“the net effect of [the] Lanham Act § 37, 15 U.S.C. § 1119 , is to give to the courts concutrent power with the Patent and Trademark Office to conduct cancellation proceedings.”).