Matter of Val. Proc., Rail Reorg. Act (1976)
green
· 40 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197620012026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Chicago and North Western Transportation Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commissi… (1982)
Cf. United States v. Miller, supra, 317 U.S. at 375 , 63 S.Ct. at 280 ; In re Valuation Proceedings, supra, 531 F.Supp. at 1324-33 ; In re Valuation *670 Proceedings, supra, 445 F.Supp. at 1040-41 ; but cf. In re Valuation Proceedings, Etc., Regional Rail Reorganization, 425 F.Supp. 266, 273 (Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.1976).
In accordance with our Memorandum of June 16, 1976, 425 F.Supp. at 289, opening briefs on the issues of NLV, CMV, and certain other matters were received on January 6, an answering brief of the Government parties on February 20, and reply briefs on March 18, 1977.
green
In re the Valuation Proceedings Under §§ 303(C) & 306 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (1984)
In the October 18, 1976 opinion we said, to much the same effect, 425 F.Supp. at 269 (footnote omitted): Here again most of the parties share our inability to discern why, under the terms of the Rail Act, the requirement that we find that the consideration is more than, less than, or equal to the “constitutional minimum” does not drain the “fair and equitable” language of all meaning as regards the adequacy of the total consideration to be received by each transferor. 2 In o…
footnote omitted
green
Penn Cent. Corp. v. United States (1994)
In re Valuation Proceedings, 425 F.Supp. 266, 276 (Sp.Ct.
We had first established the deadline as December 1, 1976, see In re Valuation Proceedings, 425 F.Supp. 266, 269 (Sp.Ct.R.R.R.A.1976) and then extended it to May 1, 1977 (Sp.Ct.
green
Matter of Val. Proc., Rail Reorg. Act (1976)
In the June 16 Memorandum we requested the parties to brief the question "whether the standard of valuation should be different if the Act be regarded as a reorganization statute, as an eminent domain statute or as both." 425 F.Supp. at 280 (footnote omitted).
footnote omitted
green
Richard Drayton, John R. Sauerteig, and Sydney G. Stevens, as Escrow Agents of the Delaware & Bound Brook Rai… (1986)
See also In the Matter of Valuation Proceedings Under Sections 303(c) and 306 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act, 425 F.Supp. 266 , 276 (Special Court, 1976).
green
Drayton v. United States (1985)
See also In the Matter of the Valuation Proceedings Under Sections 303(c) and 306 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act, 425 F.Supp. 266 , 276 (Special Court 1976).
green
Matter of Valuation Proceedings, Etc. (1982)
See In the Matter of the Valuation Proceedings, 425 F.Supp. 266, 282 ; CMV Opinion, 445 F.Supp. 994, 1004 .