How cited: Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling · Go Syfert

Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling (1985)

green · 32 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
But See · 3rd Cir. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Bordelon v. Consolidated Georex Geophysics, 628 F.Supp. 810, 812-13 (W.D.La.1986) (applying L eger); but see Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F.Supp. 1021, 1037 (N.D.Cal.1985) (following the second approach and applying Cal.Civ.Proc.Code § 877.6), aff'd in part, reversed in part on other grounds sub nom.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
In footnote 25 of Air Crash, a divided en banc panel of the Fifth Circuit, with Judges Garza, Johnson, Garwood, and Higginbotham not joining in the footnote, stated that in view of the Supreme Court's opinion in Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235 , 102 S.Ct. 252 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981), and the district court's analysis in the present case, Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F.Supp. 1021, 1034-35 (N.D.Cal.1985), it disapproved and overruled all of its Jone…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
In footnote 25 of Air Crash, a divided en banc panel of the Fifth Circuit, with Judges Garza, Johnson, Garwood, and Higginbotham not joining in the footnote, stated that in view of the Supreme Court's opinion in Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235 , 102 S.Ct. 252 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419 (1981), and the district court's analysis in the present case, Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F.Supp. 1021, 1034-35 (N.D.Cal.1985), it disapproved and overruled all of its Jone…
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
If American law is applicable, then the American court should retain jurisdiction.”). 79 821 F.2d 1147 , 1163 n.25 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc). 80 Id. (quoting Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F. Supp. 1021, 1035 (N.D.
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
If American law is applicable, then the American court should retain jurisdiction.”). 79 821 F.2d 1147 , 1163 n.25 (5th Cir. 1987) (en banc). 80 Id. (quoting Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F. Supp. 1021, 1035 (N.D.
Quote Authority · N.D. Cal.
Drilling, 615 F. Supp. 1021, 1031 (N.D.
“Singapore’s status as a 4 major center of international trade and commerce and the base of operation in South East Asia for 5 many corporations, American and foreign” is a fact that “lends weight to [the] assertion of its 6 adequacy as an alternative forum.”
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F.Supp. 1021, 1033-35 (N.D.Cal. 1985).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F.Supp. 1021, 1033-35 (N.D.Cal.1985).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, 615 F.Supp. 1021, 1030-35 (N.D.Cal.1985); Shipping Corp. of India v. American Bureau of Shipping, 603 F.Supp. 801, 804-07 (S.D.N.Y.1985).