How cited: Barwacz v. Michigan Department of Education · Go Syfert

Barwacz v. Michigan Department of Education (1987)

green · 23 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198820072026
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Michigan standards, moreover, do not require “a model education, adopting the most sophisticated pedagogical methods without fiscal or geographic constraints.... ” Barwacz v. Mich. Dept. of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1302 (W.D.Mich.1987).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Michigan standards, moreover, do not require "a model education, adopting the most sophisticated pedagogical methods without fiscal or geographic constraints...." Barwacz v. Mich. Dept. of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1302 (W.D.
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Comm. of the Town of Burlington v. Dep’t of Educ., 471 U.S. 359 (1985); Barwacz v. Mich. Dep’t of Educ., 674 F. Supp. 1296, 1308 (W.D.
suit brought under Michigan’s Mandatory Special Education Act dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Michigan standards, moreover, do not require “a model education, adopting the most sophisticated pedagogical methods without fiscal or geographic constraints .... ” Barwacz v. Mich. Dept. of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1302 (W.D.Mich.1987).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Generally, the burden of proof on judicial review “rests with the party seeking to overturn the decision of the agency.” Barwacz v. Michigan Dep’t of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1302 (W.D.Mich.1987); Century Cellunet of S. Michigan, Inc. v. City of Ferrysburg, 993 F.Supp. 1072, 1077 (W.D.Mich.1997).
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Barwacz v. Michigan Dep’t of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1302 (W.D.Mich.1987).
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Ed. 2d 385 (1985); Barwacz v. Michigan Dept. of Educ., 674 F. Supp. 1296, 1308 (W.D.
Rule Authority · Tenn. Ct. App.
Ed. 2d 385 (1985); Barwacz v. Michigan Dept. of Educ., 674 F. Supp. 1296, 1308 (W.D.
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
Comm., 910 F.2d 983, 991 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 912 , 111 S.Ct. 1122 , 113 L.Ed.2d 230 (1991), which held that Massachusetts General Law ch. 71B § 2 9 raised the IDEA’S standard; Burke County Bd. of Educ. v. Denton, 895 F.2d 973 , 983 (4th Cir.1990), which held that North Carolina General Statute § 115C-106(a) 10 raised the IDEA’S standard; Geis v. Bd. of Educ. of Parsippany-Troy Hills, Morris County, 774 F.2d 575, 582-83 (3d Cir.1985), which held that New Je…
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Left open, under our prior order and memorandum, was the question of whether compensatory damages, other than reimbursement for educational expenses may be recoverable under section 504, (See: Hall v. Knott County Board of Education, 941 F.2d 402, 407 (6th Cir.1991) (“It may be true ... that damages may be awarded for violations of the anti-discrimination provisions of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act."), while at the same time noting that there may be impediments to plaintif…
Rule Authority · D. Mass.
By Carol A. v. District School Bd., 741 F.2d 369, 372 (11th Cir.1984); Bertolucci v. San Carlos Elementary School Dist., 721 F.Supp. 1150, 1153 (N.D.Cal.1989); Barwacz v. Michigan Dep’t of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1301 (W.D.Mich.1987); see Westmoreland School Dist., 930 F.2d at 946 .
Cited · E.D. Mich. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See id. at 1302 .
Cited · W.D. Mich. · signal: see
See Barwacz v. Michigan Dep’t of Educ., 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1305 (W.D.Mich.1987).
Cited (see also) · W.D. Mich. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Barwacz v. Michigan Department of Education, 674 F.Supp. 1296, 1307 (W.D.Mich. 1987) (Enslen, J.); Gerasimou by Gerasimou v. Ambach, 636 F.Supp. 1504, 1511-12 (E.D.N.Y.1986).
Enslen, J.