Merchants Bank v. Vescio (1997)
green
· 52 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd. (2013)
Merchants Bank v. Vescio, 205 B.R. 37, 42 (D.Vt.1997).
green
Merchants Bank v. Vescio (In Re Vescio) (1997)
Merchants Bank v. Vescio, 205 B.R. 37, 41-42 (D.Vt.1997) (hereinafter “Remand Order”).
"It arises out of the practical need for openness and honesty between bank examiners and the banks they regulate, and is intended to protect the integrity of the regulatory process by privileging such communications." Merchants Bank v. Vescio , 205 B.R. 37, 42 (D.Vt.1997).
citation omitted
"It arises out of the practical need for openness and honesty between bank examiners and the banks they regulate, and is intended to protect the integrity of the regulatory process by privileging such communications." Merchants Bank v. Vescio , 205 B.R. 37, 42 (D.Vt.1997).
citation omitted
green
Mishkin v. Ageloff (1998)
See, e.g., Official Bondholders Committee v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In re Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc.), 209 B.R. 832, 837 (D.Del.1997); Merchants Bank v. Vescio, 205 B.R. 37, 40 (D.Vt.1997); In re Johns-Manville Corp., 47 B.R. at 960 .
green
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc. (2019)
But in recognizing the privilege, other courts have explained that 27 it “arises out of the practical need for openness and honesty between bank examiners 1 process by privileging such communications.” Wultz, 61 F. Supp. 3d at 281–82 2 (quoting Merchants Bank v. Vescio, 205 B.R. 37, 42 (D.
green
Merchants Bank v. Vescio (1998)
Vescio, 205 B.R. at 40.
green
Merchants Bank v. Vescio (In Re Vescio) (1997)
Merchants Bank v. Vescio, 205 B.R. 37, 41-42 (D.Vt.).